2004/11/02

200 Years
As Poofter's Froth Wyoming goes to the polls to decide which puppet of the Military Industry Complex will get to show off his peacock suit, we should consider that civilisation as we know it, specifically that which guzzles oil and spurts out Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere at an accelerating rate, has got a sunset clause. Put bluntly, this isn't going to last forever because either we're going to give out or the Earth is going to give out, or both are going to give out.

This topic has been discussed to death everywhere, and while there are folks who remain adamant that human ingenuity will get us through this death trap. Schumpeter, a very important economist called this process the dynamic destruction and recreation of value. This is fine. However, the planet is actually a finite resource. No matter how efficient humanity becomes in utilising its resources, it's eventually going to eat through all of it. Now this might be 50-100 years away depending on which brand of apocalyptic Greenie you ask. But let's say it's 200 years off. What the hell are we doing about it? Right now, we're quibbling over who gets to use up the main energy resource first and by how much.

Now, here's the thing. By definition (supplied to us by our very own trenchant critic Mr. Conservative Weasel), a conservative person would say, "this is fine, leave it alone, it's a thing of beauty, it's always worked don't change a thing."
Now, in most instances of history, this was an okay thing to say. Because many problems can be just put off to be solved by future generations. The meta-problem if you will, with sending off to tomorrow, the problems that ought to be solved today is that with our 200 year crunch-time time limit, it's eventually going to catch up with your great grand kids. Of course the powers that be in power today don't think that future people vote today so they are happy to sell them down the river.

Right now, we have two major parties paying lip-service to this issue, but both of them put in such a feeble attempt to address these issues. Things are not getting done. Neither the traditional Left nor the Right have a plan. (BTW We have a plan - go to space). Which is to day, the tradition of Left-Right politics is not going to serve us one jot, going into the last 200 years of our civilisation. It's only going to get uglier and pretty soon, it's going to be blame=throwers at 10 paces. It is against this back drop that the two US presidential candidates consist of two multi-millionaires, one who IS the oil company front man, and the in the other corner is somebody who is clearly the main man for the Industrialists of the US North East.

And then there are people who find this 2 horse race compelling and significant.
The future of our world never looked so bleak as it does today.

- Art Neuro

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

So you acknowledge that the CO2 you breathe out is not only a waste of our time but a threat to the world?

DaoDDBall said...

"Now, here's the thing. By definition, a conservative person would say, "this is fine, leave it alone, it's a thing of beauty, it's always worked don't change a thing."

I guess I don't exist by definition. Unlike Spacefreaks, I have reasoned arguements for not agreeing with 'Conscientiously Objectionable' statements. In fact, Republicans have asked for money to spend on feasability studies on greenhouse gas limiters, and the much loved Democrats have said 'no.'

You might think that would hole a Spacefreak arguement, but they ignore it, possibly calling it 'medieval' and making other claims. Another claim is that both parties are as bad as each other. This might still be true without changing facts or saving arguement.

David said...

Both parties ARE as bad as each other Mr Weasle. The difference is... you have picked one.

Good luck with that. Art & I have seen what your much loved right & the not so loved (around here) left do & are looking for a new way - not a tired old way that has already committed itself to this planets destruction.

You can stay here with John & W if you want though. Better you than me.

db

Art Neuro said...

Yeah right.
"Feasibility study on Greenhouse Gas Limiters."
LOL Let's do a feasibility study on putting a bandaid on the gaping arterial wound that is our civilisation. Does it matter then that the democrats reject it?

Even with the 'feasibility study' when will the oil company rep Mr. GWB say, "Right. You're correct, we can't just keep burning fossil fuel for heat and casual driving." Like, that's going to happen.

Don't you get it? Do I have to spell it out even more? The Idiot who propses a bandaid is AS culpable as the Idiot who rejects consideration. Time is running out. haven't you been reading this blog?
Or did you miss that argument because you're so blinkered in your love and slavish devotion to John Howard and George W. Bush?

Yes it's true, they are Great Leaders only because they have amassed great numbers of mindless followers whose ranks you are so willing to join.
Why is this so?
Why are you so enamoured of this wretched process that is driving us to extinction?
Why do you take such delight in the blame game when clearly it is detrimental to the cause of saving our civilisation?

In the mean time you say, "Oh but you didn't answer to my argument" - you don't HAVE what most sane, sentient people consider to be an argument; What you have is the tired old rhetoric of the Right which, believe me, is boring as batshit and less useful than the same.

Seriously Mr. Weasel, our advice is: Get over it.
Stop being part of the problem. Use your considerable number of grey-matter brain cells as to how you can change things for the better instead of lazily joining the chorus line of the bankrupt idealogues. It's really unbecoming of your intellect.

Art Neuro said...

And Mr. Anonymous, your courage and conviction to stand by your remarks is clearly south of the Mendoza line.
At this rate I'll clearly outlive you yet, you gormless piece of shit.

Blog Archive