2006/02/28

From The Road





After a 12 day stay on Tanegashima Island, I have emerged from the IT Blackhole that has kept me from posting up these pictures.

I really have to knuckle down and sort through some photos and tell the tale of how I came to see Japan's HII-A Flight 9 launched into space. In the mean time, please enjoy these official pickies from JAXA.

By the way, here's a video clip I took.

The SpaceFreaks Weblog

NASA Detects 'Totally New' Mystery Explosion Nearby
Here's an interesting story. Astronomers have just recently detected a new explosion, which they *think* might be a gamma ray burst, and it's only 440 million light years away. What's going to be really interesting is if it turns out to be a supernova.
Anyways, you can see the whole story here . . .

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060223_explosion.html

On The Road



This photo of a rocky beach was taken on the very beach where three Portuguese travelers landed on Tanegashima. If you really must know, it was a bitch of a trek down a slippery hill to find this nasty bit of rocky shore line, but this is indeed the very place where the West was first encountered by the Japanese. In fact, the 14th Lord Tanegashima of the Island ended up buying 2 muskets off the Portuguese and the rest of it is history. It's also the Island where they do a more refined version of ballistics known as 'rocketry'. I even had the pleasure of speaking to the descendant of the 14th Lord, one Mr. Tokikuni Tanegashima who still owns the original musket on display in the musket museum - just so that we could get permission to shoot it. Apparently he would have been the 29th in line.

I've now been on the road for 23 days. It's quite a hoik getting around remote islands off the mainland of Japan, getting in and out of planes, vans and hotels. Needless to say I have in most part been in one IT blackhole or another so it hasn't been quite so simple as to just post up where I am on the road. To date, I've been up and down the island of Okinawa and up and down the Island of Tanegashima. We've flown through Kagoshima twice and Nagoya twice. I'm now in Nagoya, looking out a window overlooking the central hub of the city but boy is the sky dreary and the streets quiet and dull.

When I get back to Metropolis, I'll probably post up detailed accounts of where I've been and what I've seen, but for now, please accept this photo as a token of my thoughts for you all. :)

2006/02/07

REVISIONS IN NEED OF REVISING: WHAT WENT WRONG IN THE IRAQ WAR

This is a report from the Strategic Studies Institute. I've only started reading it and already it has won me over:

...critics also have neglected the larger lesson thatthere are certain limits to
what military power can accomplish. Forcertain purposes, like the creation
of a
liberal democratic societythat will be a model for others, military
power is a
blunt instrument,destined by its very nature to give rise to
unintended and
unwelcomeconsequences. Rather than “do it better next time,”
a better lesson
is“don’t do it at all.”

The full report is here.

2006/02/04

While I'm On This Topic

Such A Nice Sentiment Up There...
I saw this page.
And there's this bit which I thought was amusing in a very black humour way:
Robert Menard, secretary general of Reporters Without Borders, told The Associated Press that he was surprised by the “deafening silence” of the Arab press concerning their own freedom.

“The Arab press often complains about the censorship practiced by their own government, and they were the first to set their own limits. They were unanimous in supporting their governments' appeal to punish the Danish newspaper,” said Menard.

“What we are seeing is that many (Muslims) have no idea how democracy works,” he said.
Trust me; more than the cartoons themsleves, the moral indignation the Islamists are expressing is laughable. By shutting up, the moderate Arab press gives the floor to the radical Fund-a-mental(case)-ists.

2006/02/03

Freedom of Speech Issue Of The Day

Sing 'Bomb Da Profit'


Some days ago, a Danish newspaper published a cartoon depicting the prophet Mohammed with a bomb on his head. The Islamic world has predictably and acutely gone totally ballistic and hostile, have turned out to burn flags and demand apologies and threatened the ususal violence; this time against EU nations.
Armed militants angered by a cartoon drawing of the Prophet Muhammad in several European newspapers surrounded the office of the EU Commission in Gaza and searched hotels for foreigners to kidnap in the West Bank, as outrage over the caricatures spread across the Islamic world on Thursday.

Foreign journalists, diplomats and aid workers began leaving Gaza as gunmen there threatened to kidnap citizens of France, Norway, Denmark and Germany unless the four governments apologize for the newspaper cartoon. Only several dozen foreigners were believed to be in Gaza. Many others had left in recent months, during a spate of abductions of foreign nationals.

In the West Bank city of Nablus, gunmen entered four hotels to search for foreigners to abduct, and warned hotel owners not to host citizens from several European countries. Gunmen said they also searched two apartments, but found no Europeans. The gunmen said foreigners had three days to leave Nablus on their own.

Germany and its press has waded into the debate, defending Freedom of Speech.
In Germany, opinion has also largely fell on the side of free speech, although the DJV journalism union was critical of the republication of the cartoons in Germany on Wednesday, saying it violated the country's press codex, a series of guidelines regarding ethics in journalism.

One paragraph of the codex condemns the publication of content that could offend the religious sentiments of a group of people.

On Thursday, however, DJV changed its position, saying that publication in the conservative Die Welt and the left-leaning taz newspapers did not conflict with the ethics code.

"The reproduction was part of the overall mission of journalism," DJV spokesman Hendrik Zörner told DW-WORLD. "It serves to document the debate and should be differentiated from the first publication (of the cartoons) in Denmark."

German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble rejected calls for the government to apologize for the publication: "Why should the government apologize for the exercise of press freedom?"

While several publications and officials expressed understanding for Muslim anger, they described the reaction in the Middle East as excessive.

A Bishop of the Protestant Church in Germany, Margot Käßmann, in an editorial in Der Tagesspiegel newspaper, said the response was "absolutely inappropriate and in my opinion, purposefully controlled. Sometimes Christians' feelings are hurt as well, but the answer to that cannot be threats of violence!"
To be accurate, you don't see the likes of Fred Nile and his gangs with AK-47s picketing films like 'The Last Temptation of Christ' or art works like the immortal 'Piss Christ'. As deplorable as Fred Nile and his ilk can be, they're not threatening to kill you and your family, or kidnap your fellow unbeliever. I'm not saying they don't want to, but at least they seem to recognise that sort of thing might be 'un-Christian' - not to menttion against the law.

Which leads me to this point: Maybe it is very Islamist to get offended at every slight, don the tea-towel and sunglasses look, grab the Ak-47 and lawlessly take to the streets to burn flags. Because lately, that's the image of Islam that's getting seen across the world. It's a far cry from the measured sagely chides and ripostes of Omar Sharif's character in 'Lawrence of Arabia'. It's not exactly great press on behalf of Islam.

They can't really blame others for their bad PR.
Which is also an interesting aspect that has been discussed before. Because the muslim world denied itself figurative/descriptive art, it really hasn't developed the kind of image savvy 'literacy' of other parts of the world. Al Jazeera, whatever its merits and demerits looks like crap TV. Movies coming out of the muslim world as a general group look badly composed, badly lit and badly cut; much more so than the average (third)World Movie coming out of say Burkina Faso or Tibet.

Then there's this idiot who caught fire from his own flag-burning effort. What a dork.

Quick question: Do they have the equivalent of 'dorks' in the Islamist lexicon?

I guess the crux of the biscuit for some folks is whether the cartoon can be considered a kind of racial vilification or if it's actually pointing out something that is plainly obvious to everybody - but in an attempt to deny 'the emperor has no clothes' (i.e., the radical Islamists do carry on like warmongers dressed as religous righteousness), people are turning it into a debate about offending minorities/religious sensitivities and the such like.

Still, it has to be said: what a Danish cartoonist thinks of your religious beliefs only hurts you in the pride. Nobody's exactly going to die from an acute case of bad sense of humour or even bad taste; I mean, what you believe doesn't really matter squat to me until you start threatening me with your Ak-47. ...and this is why it really sucks that it's even an issue, thanks to the cutting edge tea-towel-fashion-brigade.

It is however exactly like the business surrounding the fatwa announced against Salman Rushdie. The demand that we exercise our great tolerance for their intolerance based on their fear, ignorance and stupidity is excruciatingly hypocritical and wrong. What worries me is that with Rushdie, the sane parts of the world rallied around Mr. Rushdie because he was a celebrated author; the author of the original cartoon won't be protected by public opinion to the same degree because he would be a 'mere local comic'. Who protects the clown? As a fellow clown, and somebody who relies heavily on the freedom of speech, I wish to announce my solidarity with the cartoonist.

UPDATE:
This business of Islamist fury has hit higher pitch around the globe as more and more muslims got into the spirit of anti-European sentiments. Justn looking at the googlenews page, I can see 1127 entries from around the world concerning this topic, so I'd say I'm hardly likely to be the only one maaking pointed commments aabout all this brouhaha.

I did notice some interesting comments so I'll post them up.

1. From Reuters UK:
The Indonesian government condemned the cartoons and said it had expressed its concern to Denmark's envoy, Foreign Ministry spokesman Yuri Thamrin told a weekly news conference.
As a democracy, Indonesia welcomed freedom of expression but drew the line at mocking sacred religious symbols, he said.

"I think this is not only about a bilateral issue between Indonesia and Denmark, this is a much more serious issue ... It involves the whole Islamic world vis-a-vis Denmark and vis-a-vis the trend of Islamophobia," Thamrin added.
Islamophobia? That's a new phrase. I must make sure I keep a track of that word. It's as if the Foreign Affairs Minister of Indonesia is trying to characterise Islamists in the same catgory as spiders, heights and homosexuals.

2. USA's ABC as opposed to our own ABC has this nugget:
France's Grand Rabbi Joseph Sitruk said he shared Muslim anger.

"We gain nothing by lowering religions, humiliating them and making caricatures of them. It's a lack of honesty and respect," he said. He said freedom of expression "is not a right without limits."

In the Arab world, a Jordanian newspaper, Shihan, took the bold step Thursday of running some of the drawings, saying it wanted to show its readers how offensive the cartoons were but also urging the world's Muslims to "be reasonable." Its editorial noted that Jyllands-Posten had apologized, "but for some reason, nobody in the Muslim world wants to hear the apology."
Well yeah. Because they're looking for a fight, not because they're really offended by blasphemy. I beg to differ with the Grand Rabbi. There's much to be gained by abandoning such outdated modes of thinking as religion. It is indeed the opiate of the masses as evinced by the masses of people turning up around the world to stomp on burning flags. Indeed, if there weren't so many religious hard-liners on both sides, we might have seen true peace in the Middle East by now.

3. This is from the Guardian:
Opinion in Germany has hardened in favour of editors daring to publish. "It is apparent that the demonstrations are the biggest, and the diplomatic reactions the most vehement, in countries where authoritarian regimes are under domestic pressure from Islamist opposition forces," Boris Kalnoky wrote in Die Welt.

The conservative Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung went further, calling for the caricatures to be published in as many newspapers as possible. Urging "Europe-wide solidarity", it said: "Religious fundamentalists who do not respect the difference between satire and blasphemy have a problem not only with Denmark, but with the entire western world."

The French tabloid France Soir, which originally said it would not apologise for printing the images, did so but only after its managing director, Jacques Lefranc, was sacked by its owner, Raymond Lakah.
Well, I've hardened my position on this from the start so I can't get harder.
The Europeans had the Hitler and Goebbels experience in their past. I just can't see them saying 'Sure thing. Your religious sensitivities over our freedom of speech'.
Which led me to this thought: Maybe the Islamist movement is targeting the Western liberals into an adversarial position so they can paint a clearer picture of 'Them or Us'. At the same time, this stuff paints the moderate muslims into a corner: "Damn it whos side are you on? It's the Koran or the sword!"

My guess? Expect a war on Iran around May.

2006/02/01

Off On Sunday

Just a quick note to let you all know I fly out on Sunday 5th Feb and return on 9th Mar. It's the longest roadtrip I've been on. Don't knoww if can post aanything while I'm over there. I will take my laptop with me, so we'll see.

There have been some amazing changes of schedule within that block but as of this minute I think we're on top off it ... right now. Of course it may blow up on us tomorrow morning, but for now, we're on top. Yay.

So if you don't hear from me this month, apologies in advance.
Peace,
Art

No Shit Batman

It's a Quiet Yankee Off-Season
Okay I swore off politics as a New Years resolution but it's 1 Feb now when we all fall off the wagon. Besides, the Yankee newsfront is slow, slow, slow. The biggest story of the past week were: they passed on signing Mike Piazza as a DH; A-Rod picked up his second MVP prize; and Reuben Sieerra signed with the Twinkies. Like, yeah. It's not changing the state of the Union in Steinbrenner-land. It's not like they traded for Miguel Tejada with a sack of beans. Heh heh.

I did see this lovely exchange somewhere on the net:
Red Sox fan: Now if we can just get a CF and a SS that's credible, we'll beat the Yankees hands down.
Yankee fan: Yes. And if I could just make myself look like Brad Pitt I can bang both Jennifer Anniston AND Angelina Jolie.
Man, how can I ever give up baseball when I can come across humour like that.

Unfortunately, I did notice these following stories today which changes the complexion of the world so let me sock it to you today with the "No Shit Batman" story of the day No.1:
WASHINGTON — The future and character of the United States will be largely determined in the next year by getting over its dependency on foreign oil, ongoing turmoil in Iraq, the growing threat from Iran and concerted efforts to take care of America's own, President Bush said Tuesday night during his fifth annual State of the Union address.

"We will choose to act confidently in pursuing the enemies of freedom or retreat from our duties in the hope of an easier life. We will choose to build our prosperity by leading the world economy — or shut ourselves off from trade and opportunity," the president told a joint session of Congress.

"In a complex and challenging time, the road of isolationism and protectionism may seem broad and inviting, yet it ends in danger and decline. The only way to protect our people … the only way to secure the peace … the only way to control our destiny is by our leadership."

In order to get the nation's priorities done and reduce partisan bickering that in recent months has threatened to boil over, Bush said lawmakers and others need to confront issues "in a spirit of good will and respect for one another."

"There is a difference between responsible criticism that aims for success and defeatism that refuses to acknowledge anything but failure. Hindsight alone is not wisdom. And second-guessing is not a strategy," Bush said.
Gag me with a spoon.
They're totally hooked on to foreign oil with a former oil man as their president. It's not a speech that has a lot of credibility in terms of good governance. And this bit of trying to differentiate responsible and irresponisble criticism is like rhetoric written by a sub-100 IQ high schooler. You wonder in fear for the world.

Here's the "No Shit, Batman" Story No.2 of the day:
WASHINGTON - Iran is refusing to turn over to U.N. investigators a copy of a black market document it could use to build nuclear weapons, according to a confidential U.N. report Tuesday.

The document, which Iran received from an international nuclear smuggling ring, describes aspects of fabricating the explosive core of a nuclear bomb. The document is one more piece of evidence supporting concerns that Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapons program in the guise of peaceful nuclear power research.

China and Russia agreed Tuesday to support reporting Iran to the United Nations Security Council, which has the power to impose sanctions. The agreement came after talks in London attended by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

The U.N. report will be provided to the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog agency, who meet Thursday on whether to report Iran to the Security Council. The report was obtained by several news organizations, including Knight Ridder.

The report said that Iranian experts had begun preparations for test-scale uranium enrichment, the process that produces low enriched uranium for power plants and highly enriched uranium for warheads.

Iran remained defiant, showing no signs of accepting demands by the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany to re-freeze uranium enrichment work and meet IAEA demands to reveal all aspects of its nuclear program.

Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, was quoted on a government-run English language Internet site as warning that a referral to the Security Council would mean "the end of diplomacy."

Iran, the world's fourth largest oil exporter, has said that retaliatory steps could include expelling IAEA inspectors and measures that could drive up world petroleum prices.

Iran insists its program is for peaceful purposes, but admitted in 2002 to concealing the project from IAEA monitoring for 18 years. U.S. and European officials believe the Iranian military is secretly developing nuclear arms under cover of the civilian effort.

The new report was an update on Iran's compliance with the IAEA investigation of its nuclear program. That program is based in part on purchases of know-how and technologies from a Pakistani-led black market network.

One key issue involves a document bought from the network that Iran showed agency experts last year. The document is about requirements for casting and machining depleted and enriched uranium metal into hemispheres.

Hemispheres form the explosive cores of nuclear weapons. They have no application in civilian power plants.
The rest of it doesn't get any better.
Why do the Iranians think the world is just going to roll on this? Because of oil? Because the world just rolled on Pakistan and India? I hate to remind them but they still are considered a 'rogue nation' by that big bully state, the US of A. Britain, France and Germany aren't happy aabout it and now China and Russia aren't happy about it.
Expect fireworks. Buy shares in Haliburtons.

QUICK SHOT
I really like David Letterman - I don't know why, but I guess I like glibness. Glib is good. Charming is good. Facetiousness is good. Libertarianism is good. It's laissez fair in the best sense. Live and let live and all that.

On the other hand I really find Bill O'Reilly to be odious; As odious as the Angry Fat Man (who is yet to die of the heart attack like he promised, the fat, rat bastard!). Radical Fascism is mean-spirited, nasty, unconstructive, negative and basically the provenance of cunts and Dog-Rapists and the such like; which, by the way, I'm entirely happy to characterise in public that The Angry Fat Man is indeed a Dog-Raping Cunt Radical Fascist.

Anyway, I want to share this clip because actually I think 99.99% of what O'Reilly has to say is crap.

Blog Archive