2006/07/30

Cleaning Up Afghanistan

Get The Drug Lords



For years, Afghanistan has been the big sore on the world when it comes to the herion trade.
Now, NATO is stepping into do war with these drug warlords.
General Richards said at a news conference in Kabul, the capital, that the violence in southern Afghanistan was inextricably linked to drugs.

“Essentially for the last four years some very brutal people have been developing their little fiefdoms down there and exporting a lot of opium to the rest of the world,” General Richards said.

“That very evil trade is being threatened by the NATO expansion in the south,” he added. “This is a very noble cause we’re engaged in and we have to liberate the people from that scourge of those warlords.”

Afghanistan is going through the bloodiest phase of violence since the fall of the Taliban government in 2001, with most attacks occurring in the south.

NATO’s expansion in the south signals the end of the American-led coalition’s big offensive there, which started last month and resulted in the deaths of hundreds of people, including militants, civilians, soldiers and government officials.

The Taliban, rebels tied to the country’s former rulers, and drug gangs have operated freely in the south for years and are putting up fierce resistance.

Afghanistan is the world’s top producer of opium and its derivative, heroin. Opium poppy cultivation is increasing in the south, and it profits have helped finance the insurgency, according to security analysts.

General Richards said NATO, with up to 9,000 troops from 37 countries, would not target the opium farmers, but would try to provide security to foster development of an “alternative economy.”
Well, better late than never.

Deadline Shuffle

The Specualtion Is...
...Bobby Abreu and Cory Lidle to the Bronx for prospects Steve White and C.J. Henry.
There are still dollar signs to sort out, no-trade clauses to be waived and prospects to be settled on. But it sure looks as if Abreu is moving his act to the Bronx sometime in the next day and a half. And all indications Saturday night were that pitcher Cory Lidle is going to ride that Metroliner along with him. The Phillies and Yankees spent many waking hours Friday and Saturday trotting a thousand different trade options out there. But in the end, the one that seemed to work best for everyone was the option that is going to relocate Abreu and Lidle 100 miles to the north, for a package of three or four of the Yankees' best prospects not named Phillip Hughes or Jose Tabata. The two teams were said to be whittling a list of eight or nine names to a group they could settle on. But while that whittling process wasn't over late Saturday, it was believed that two names the Phillies had targeted were the Yankees' highly regarded No. 1 pick a year ago, shortstop C.J. Wilson, and 6-foot-5 power arm Steven White. That was a price the Yankees could easily live with, however, especially since they're going to owe Abreu close to $37 million over the next 2½ years. The Yankees were the one team in the Abreu hunt that always believed that, in the end, the Phillies' best option would be to clear every dollar in his contract off their debt sheet. So while other teams listened to Abreu's money demands and turned in other directions, the Yankees waited the Phillies out. Finally, on Friday, the Phillies lowered their talent requests -- and the deliberations began. The Phillies tried dangling Abreu alone and didn't feel they were getting enough back. They tried packaging him with pitcher Jon Lieber, who is owed another $10 million through 2007 himself. But the Yankees felt taking on another chunk of cash that large entitled them to offer even less than they would for Abreu alone. So the Phillies substituted Lidle for Lieber, and that apparently made the puzzle pieces fit. No matter how happy the Phillies may be to lop Abreu's money off their I.O.U. list, they also knew they couldn't march up to the podium after trading a player like this and say, "We just saved $20 million on our car insurance." They had to get real players back who could allow them to save face and restock their system. And including their best available starting pitcher was the move that made that happen. So by late Saturday night, there seemed to be only one significant question left: When would they all be stepping to that podium?
At least the Phillies are not geting Philip Hughes or Jose Tabata.
I would have thought Eric Duncan was the name that would surface in all of this but either the Phillies didn't want him or the Yankees didn't want to part with him. C.J. Henry's been dissappointing so far, but you have to figure this trade isn't too bad if you consdier that C. J. Henry only came to the Yankees because they let Jon Lieber walk to the Phillies.
I'm a little uncomfortable with this when you consider that the Yankees have already flipped another middle infield minor leaguer Hector Made for Sal Fasano only days ago.

Maybe Made was going to be another Erick Almonte, but it seems if they throw out C.J. Henry to boot, you'd have to start asking what's wrong with these MIF guys and why were they in the organisation to start with. As in, why draft C.J. Henry as a first rounder in the first place?

For the record, this is where he is at:
Many of the position players are struggling to adapt to full season ball. Last year’s first round draft pick, shortstop C.J. Henry, started the season off on the wrong foot. After an extended trip on the DL due to a hamstring injury, Henry returned in good form and bumped his average all the way up to .295, but when the dog days of summer rolled around, he began to struggle.

Henry has been hovering around .220 the past few months and has now settled in at .237 with 33 RBI, 30 runs, two home runs, and 86 strikeouts. Consistency has been his main problem, especially in the field where he has shown flashes of brilliance but also has struggled with routine plays, routine throws, and trying to make the spectacular happen.

Henry has racked up a total of 24 errors in 55 games at shortstop. Yankee fans can only hope that Henry is the second coming of Derek Jeter, who totaled 57 errors in 128 games during his first year of full-season baseball.

“You can see why the Yankees made him their first-round draft pick,” RiverDogs play-by-play announcer Josh Maurer commented. “The guy has a lot of raw ability, but he is definitely rough around the edges and will need a bunch of work. I really think he is going to make it, though it may take a lot of work."

“In the long run though, these struggles he’s going through will help him, it’s gonna’ make him work even harder. I like his ability all around and I think he’ll be fine.”
Yowza. Still, I must say I'm not really comfortable with trading away C.J. Henry right now for 1.5 seasons of Bobby Abreu plus Cory Lidle for the rest of this year. The other thing about getting Abreu is that he's going to be getting the money that would have been ear-marked for Sheffield next year, so we know this is going to be the last year for sure for Sheff in the Bronx.

UPDATE: Sure enough, the trade went through. The Yanks got both Abreu AND Corey Lidle while sending C.J Henry, Matt Smith (not Steve White) and 2 other minor leaguers. The lamentations of the Yankee-haters were heard across the globe. Then, to make matters more interesting, The Yankees scored Craig Wilson from the Pirates for Shawn Chacon. Thank you Shawn for the memories and this wonderful little haul.

2006/07/28

Trade A-Rod?


You've Got To Be Kidding Me
There's been this weird swell of press articles about a possible trade where the Yankees trade away Alex Rodriguez. It's started from comments made by former Mets GM Steve Phillips.

Brooks Robinson, Baltimore Oriole great in the 1970s, had this to say.
“I was watching TV last night and I really had to laugh at the guy who said he might be traded,” Robinson said. “There’s no way in the world that A-Rod is going to go anywhere. If they don’t have A-Rod, they don’t win.”

“A-Rod is just going through a little crisis right now, which might be a week long,” Robinson said. “Most of his errors are throwing errors and that can be corrected very easily, but everyone has those streaks. You have streaks as a third baseman or a shortstop where every ball you get is not a big hop, it’s an in-between hop, it’s a tough play.”
Thank goodness there's a sane voice out there.
For the record, Brian Cashman has stated that A-Rod is not going anywhere. There's also this interesting take on the topic.
For the better part of a month, Steve Phillips has urged Brian Cashman to trade Alex Rodriguez. Of all the commentary concerning the fragile Yankees third baseman, and his funk, Phillips, the former Mets GM, has provided the most provocative.
This is why ESPN suits are paying Phillips. With powerhouse national vehicles like ESPN Radio, ESPN "SportsCenter," and ESPN "Baseball Tonight," at his disposal, Phillips' "trade A-Rod" message has received maximum exposure without even reaching its crescendo.

Judging by the way he's flogged this line, Phillips has several more choruses to sing. This is his greatest hit album. Stevie One Note is a man on a mission. No, make that a crusade.

Is it personal?

Or is Phillips offering legitimate bias-free analysis?

The longer he continues to push for an A-Rod trade, the more recognition Phillips gets as a TV personality. This will help to further distance him from his halcyon days of Mo Vaughn and Roger Cedeno.

On Sunday's edition of "Baseball Tonight," Phillips was at it again. It only takes a blink of an eye, and the letter "A" rolling out of someone's mouth, to set him off.

"Ultimately, they are going to have to trade him and they can trade him if the time is right," Phillips said. "It's become the thing to do in New York to boo Alex Rodriguez. . . . When that happens in New York, it doesn't stop. Now we see it impacting his performance. I don't see how he gets out of this rut. The Yankees have to move him and cut their losses now because it can get to the point where they can't move him."

Phillips was so persuasive, his colleague Harold Reynolds agreed A-Rod should be moved. John Kruk dissented. Reynolds and Kruk argued. This was wonderful TV inspired by Phillips.

Still, there is a bigger issue here. Former athletes, coaches and even general managers go into broadcasting with different agendas. For guys like Bill Parcells, Pat Riley and now Lou Piniella, the goal is to avoid controversy. They purposely pull punches because they want to return to coaching or managing. They don't want to criticize players or coaches they eventually will have to deal with.
Let's be Frank; better still, let's be Mets owner Fred Wilpon for a moment.
Mr. Phillips, it's because you make recommendations like this that you are now a commentator and no longer a GM, while Brian Cashman astutely traded and obtained Alex Rodrigues as the Yankees GM; and better still, he's got the common sense to hold onto him, unlike the stupid move you are advising.

It's really time the media just shut up about every slump A-Rod lands in. Shut up and let him play. I'm a commited A-Rod-As-Yankee fan; I'm in his corner.

The Other Trade Rumour
Scott Proctor for Wilson Betemit.
I'd do it in a heartbeat. Please Mr. Cashman, if it's true, pull the trigger on this one.

Fantasy Baseball Comment
My league, The Jack Kerouac Memorial League is a keeper league with 8 players kept at the end of this season. 3rd year keepers get a draft penalty asigned to them. For my team, Jeter is my 3rd year player and A-Rod is a 3rd year player for team 'My Time To Shine'.

He actually proposed a trade, which was a great offer, but I thought about it otherwise. Really, you don't trade franchise players, even in Fantasy baseball. I'm willing to take my draft penalty for Jeter, and I'd be willing to do the same for A-Rod.

There are some astute guys in our league, some, like Peter B, who wins just on the back of objective number crunching. Steve Phillips would lose in my league every year.

2006/07/25

My Week Of Yankee Fandom

Mid-Season Frustrations

The Yankees did a lot worse in this last week compared to the previous week, which sort of negated the effort. The Toronto Blue Jays took 3 of 4 from the Yankees and really, they were only in it for 2 of those games. Randy Johnson also lost a 3-2 game with the Mariners, before they got to Toronto which means that apart from Wang, the starting rotation went through without getting a win.

Principal among that problem has been the 5th starter hole, currently occupied by Sir Sidney Ponson, he who was picked up off the waivers. He has now put together 1 okay outing and 1 crap outing. In the crap outing, he was followed up by Kris Wilson and Shawn Chacon who added kerosene onto the fire he started to let the scoreline bloat out to 13-5.

Shawn Chacon who was last year's saviour is this year's colostomy bag. It's a shame, but he needs to find how to throw his curve ball for strikes again. Aaron Small too is last year's news, as he has been DFA'ed; but will there be pitching help coming? Pretty unlikely. Most of the trade rumours surrounding the Yankes involve outfield help to plug he respective holes of Matsui and Sheffield. Dare I say it, but they're effectively waiting for Carl Pavano and Octavio Dotel. Don't like that, no siree.

The hitting hasn't been much better either, as the Yankee lineup collectively delivered a line that wouldn't look wrong on Tony Womack's baseball card.
It's not really a newsflash that the Yankees have stunk over their last five games. On July 18, after winning nine of ten games, the Yankees were .5 games out of first place and seemingly surging. Since then, they've lost four of five games, culminating in today's 15-3 13-5 thrashing at the hands of the Blue Jays, and have dropped two more games in the standing.

I realize that the popular opinion among many is to blame this all on Alex Rodriguez, who had a horrendous week (particularly defensively), but looking at the five game stats shows an entire team in a slump.


So the whole team is hitting like RLYW's favorite whipping boy Tony Womack right now. Derek Jeter is hitting decently, but when the team is struggling to get any offense, I really wish he'd eschew the stupid bunts that he is so fond of, especially when there is no one else on the team that is hitting. I've been touting Andy Phillips due to his minor league performance and his glove, but his offense has gotten to the point where he is hurting the team, regardless of his glove being an upgrade over Giambi. I don't think the team can afford to keep running him out there at this point. He's not a passable first baseman right now. I don't know that Carlos Pena is any great bet, but I'd have to think he'd outperform Phillips right now, and I was not very confident in that before.
Ugh.
Other thoughts:
Every time I see Ted Lilly, I think, that's a guy the Yankees definitely did not need to trade. The Lilly trade brought in Jeff Weaver, who then got flipped for Kevin Brown and we know how those two gents went. And there he s being a serviceable No.2 in Toronto. He need only have been a No.3 or No. 4 in the current Yankee rotation and he would've ben a good enough replacement for the departed Andy Pettitte.

A-Rod hit his 450th Homer and then has stopped hitting for the last 10ABs. Thank goodness this wasn't going down in NYC. Could you imagine the booing? What do these fans want? For him to fail? Weird. I still like A-Rod and love having him play 3B for the Yanks. It could be better with him playing SS, but you know how it is.
Here's an interesting little chat with Reggie Jackson.
"This is his chance," Reggie Jackson said on Friday, "to be a real Yankee."

Jackson has had a bad month himself, down with a bad back for much of it. But he watches the games. And he can still talk.

"I hear people say (A-Rod) might not be tough enough for this," Jackson said. "He's more than tough enough. You don't do what he's done in this game without being tough enough. I see it on his face every night. I see that he knows what every player knows, whether they're as great as he is or not: What a hard, humbling game this really is. You know why he'll play through this? Because he has to. He'll do what he's always done, and show up every day and go to work with a toolbox that has more in it than anybody else playing. More than (Albert) Pujols, more than anybody else you want to talk about.

"I signed the biggest contract once, and I knew when I did what I was taking on. And you better believe I knew that it was one more thing that I was going to have to carry up the hill with me. Alex is going up that same hill now. And it's like I just said: He'll make it because he has to, because we've got more than 60 home runs and 200 RBI on the bench (Matsui, Sheffield) and because he's as great as he is and because he just has to.

"It's like I told Jeter that time when he was 0-for-32: Figure it out because you ain't going anywhere. There ain't no place to hide. You never get hurt. You're not sitting down. You're gonna be there every day and you're Derek Jeter. Same way with Alex. He's Alex Rodriguez.

He'll figure it out, too."

Jackson was asked about the boos.

"I wish they didn't boo him," he said. "I wish they didn't boo me. But I always respect the fans and love them and in the end, they aren't really a part of this, even if you know they want to love him. This isn't about whether you think the boos are justified or unjustified. It isn't about the media. This is about him. The guy has all that talent.

"You take on a lot of things when you take the money and come here and tough times are part of it. He'll get through this and he'll be better for it."

Reggie, who didn't think he would make it through the summer of 1977, who finished with three home runs on three swings in Game 6, finished by saying this:

"It's only July," Mr. October said.
Amen.

2006/07/20

Yasukuni Shrine Stuff


As we all know, there is much conroversy surrounding the Yasukuni Shrine. Prime Ministers of Japan want to visit. Many Japanese politicians do visit the place in droves. Yet it houses the graves of those convicted as 'A' Class War criminals from Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal. And that bit seems to create a lot of tension with Mainland China who have a lot of political capital to gain by harping on about WWII to Japan. It's craven, but all politics is craven. :)

Today, we find out that the late Showa Emperor made a point of not visiting the Yasukuni Shrine after 1975 because it the Shrine interred the bodies of the 'A' class War Criminals.
Here's the news item.
昭和天皇が靖国神社のA級戦犯合祀(ごうし)に関し、「だから私はあれ以来参拝していない。それが私の心だ」などと語ったとするメモを、当時の富田朝彦宮内庁長官(故人)が残していたことが20日、明らかになった。

 昭和天皇はA級戦犯の合祀に不快感を示し、自身の参拝中止の理由を述べたものとみられる。参拝中止に関する昭和天皇の発言を書き留めた文書が見つかったのは初めて。

 遺族によると、富田氏は昭和天皇との会話を日記や手帳に詳細に記していた。このうち88年4月28日付の手帳に「A級が合祀され その上 松岡、白取までもが」「松平の子の今の宮司がどう考えたのか 易々(やすやす)と 松平は平和に強い考(え)があったと思うのに 親の心子知らずと思っている だから私(は)あれ以来参拝していない それが私の心だ」などの記述がある。

 「松岡、白取」は、靖国神社に合祀されている14人のA級戦犯の中の松岡洋右元外相と白鳥敏夫元駐伊大使とみられる。2人は、ドイツ、イタリアとの三国同盟を推進するなど、日本が米英との対立を深める上で重大な役割を果たした。

 また、「松平」は終戦直後に宮内大臣を務めた松平慶民氏と、その長男の松平永芳氏(いずれも故人)を指すとみられる。永芳氏は、靖国神社が78年にA級戦犯合祀を行った当時、同神社の宮司を務めていた。

 昭和天皇は戦後8回、靖国神社を参拝したが、75年11月が最後になった。その理由を昭和天皇自身や政府が明らかにしなかったため、A級戦犯合祀が理由との見方のほか、75年の三木首相の参拝をきっかけに靖国参拝が政治問題化したためという説などが出ていた。富田氏が残したメモにより、「A級戦犯合祀」説が強まるものとみられる。靖国神社には今の陛下も即位後は参拝されていない。

 富田氏は74年に宮内庁次長に就任。78年からは同庁長官を10年間務め、2003年11月に死去した。

(2006年7月20日13時1分 読売新聞)
The gist of it is that a courtier Tomohiko Tomita died and left memos of his conversations with the late Showa Emperor, and in it we find that he clearly states he doesn't go there because of the people interred there. It shows that he felt quite uncomfortable about that development and disapproved of the Shinto priest who organised the 'A' Class War Criminals to be interred. Which is to say, he greatly detested Yosuke Matsuoka and Toshio Shiratori for their roles in pushing Japan towards a war with America and the British Commonwealth.

This is an interesting development because it's going to add momentum to the political argument that the 'A' Class War Criminals should not be interred at the Yasukuni Shrine. At the same time, it's going to bolster the claims of future prime ministers who will be able to say, the Yasukuni Shrine is not about honoring War Criminals, but it's about the war dead.
They're already predicting it will influence the thinking of Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi.
昭和天皇は1978年にA級戦犯が合祀されて以降、同神社に参拝していない。メモは、明確になっていないその意図を探る貴重な資料であるとともに、小泉純一郎首相の靖国参拝にも影響を与えそうだ。
It's also possible that it's going to open up a lot of debating as to what to do with these 'A' Class War Criminals' graves.
The issue of War Crimes is another debate, so I'm not getting into that today.

UPDATE:
Here's another article on the heels of the news.
小泉純一郎首相は二十日午後、昭和天皇が靖国神社のA級戦犯合祀(ごうし)に不快感を示していたとするメモが見つかったことに関し、自らの靖国参拝に与える影響について「ありません。それぞれの人の思いですから。心の問題ですから。強制するものでもないし、あの人が行ったからとか、いいとか悪いとかという問題でもない」と述べて、九月までの任期内の靖国参拝に含みを残した。

 昭和天皇がA級戦犯合祀に不快感を示していたことについては「詳細は分かりませんが、これは心の問題ですから。(昭和天皇)陛下におかれても、さまざまな思いがおありになったんだと思う」と指摘。

 A級戦犯合祀以降、昭和天皇と今の天皇陛下が靖国参拝をしていないことについては「それぞれの人の思いがあるから、私がどうこう言う問題じゃない。心の問題ですから、参拝されてもいいし、されなくてもいい。自由ですから」と述べるにとどめた。

 首相はまた、A級戦犯分祀を求める意見があることについて「一宗教法人に対して、こうあるべきだと、政府として言わない方がいい。議論は結構です」と否定的見解を示した。

 一方、安倍晋三官房長官は同日午後の記者会見で、A級戦犯の戦争責任について「極東軍事裁判において、被告が平和に対する罪などを犯したとして有罪判決を受けたのは事実だ。わが国は異議を申し立てる立場にはない」と、従来の政府見解に変わりないと説明した。

It essentially says PM Koizumi won't change his position about anything. He believes his visits fall under freedom of religion, which is probably correct. Though, it does create a lot of diplomatic tension. Surely some of it is provocation on the part of Koizumi himself. Having said that, he is the out-going Prime Minister. The likely successors are making different noises: Shinzo Abe points out that "the 'A' Class War Criminals were tried and found guilty by the War Crimes Tribunal so it is not the position of this Government ot argue otherwise."
In other words he may push to have the 'A' Class War Criminals to be moved out of Yasukuni Shrine should he succeed Junichiro Koizumi.

2006/07/19

News From My Part Of The World


Yeah, Yeah, Whatever...
The way I blog is to have google news throw headlines at me and I pick the ones that look like things I'd be interested in. Which explains the crazy variety of topics that come up on this weblog.

Recently, events around the world have hotted up so I've written more about those things more than some of my more favourite concerns, such as the New York Yankees. So with this entry, I'm determined to make note of the Yankees plus a couple of other things.

I know World War III is about to errupt out in the Holy Land and what have you, but there are more interesting things in this world than state-sponsored-spectacles of killing and maiming.

How Are The Yankees Doing?
They're doing great, thank you very much. Instead of completely falling out of the pennant race after Matsui and Sheffield got injured, they've managed to stay right in the thick of it. Going into the All-Star break, they were 3.5 games behind Boston. Thanks to some fine playing they're now only half a game behind. Mind you, The Bososx are playing the Royals this series while the Yankees have been mixing it with the Mariners, but the sweep against the reigning World Champions ChiSox was pretty darn good. with 60-odd games to go, this is all looking very exciting.

How Are My Fantasy Teams Doing?
Quite okay in the Jack Kerouac Memorial League. I'm managing to stay in first place this week so far. It didn't look like I'd crack the Top 3 this season, but a few things have fallen into place and it's looking not too bad at all.

My AFL team also notched up a win over the weekend. While that season is essentially over for me, there's a vague hope I'll finish in the top 8 if only my team can get 2 wins out of 3 in the three remaining matches. Of course then I looked at my remaining 3 opponents and thought, "Won't happen".

Recording Sessions
Our good friend Chris, a.k.a. 'Pharmakeus' was up from Canberra last week and he recorded some guitar over 2 nights. They'll be making their way into recordings that I'll post up at iCompositions soon. Recording guitar solos are difficult. Performances are so hard to wrangle. I don't know why. It just seems to be so.

One of the songs we worked on was 'Turning Wheel of Science', a track I've already done a version of, but Michelle Z really wanted to have a shot at singing it, so we're doing another version. I daresay this version is turning out much *nicer*. It's an old song we used to attempt in the rehearsal studio but it was simply too hard.

We're also doing another track called 'Americans' which is an old warhorse of a song from when I was in the band 'Vega V'. This version however, incorporates a whole lot more arranegment and studio gimickry. It has expanded to over 48 tracks. It's simply the largest musical project I've had to mix on my Mac so far. The scope of it is enormous.

The third song for which he recorded a solo, is 'Macondo 'Bongo', a re-telling of Gabriel Garcia Marquez's 'One Hundred Years of Solitude'. That was probably the most friction-free session.

Anyway, keep an eye out for these tracks in the coming months. These tracks are a lot more ambitious than the prevous fare.

iCompositions Thoughts
In the last month I've come across some truly astounding pieces of recording on the site. It's made me re-think my involvement at the site on top of the pondering I was doing already. In a nutshell, there are some serious professionals doing some seriously professional stuff on that site. It really made me think, "What the hell am I doing showing my stuff when there are people like this, who don't pull punches?"

As a result I've taken down most of my tracks. Some of them, I've archived onto my archive site at Multiuply.com, which you can find on the right column. Others, I will be re-appraising and hoping to do new versions. Of course after I took down my tracks, the fellas at iComp started offering an archiving option, but it's much better this way.

The long and short of it is, I just don't want to be damned on the basis of one of my many 'experiments'. If I'm going to experiment, I'm going to post them up at MacIdol or somthing. I'm only going to post up songs I'm serious about at iComp. It's all about the single now.

Israel Points Finger At Iran

Getting Ugly In The Holy Land


In a mess that is now getting to be of biblical proportions, Israel is claiming Iran is behind the recent Hezbollah kidnappings which provoked the Israeli retaliations.
Ehud Olmert said that the cross-border raid in which the two soldiers were taken and eight others killed was co-ordinated with Tehran.

About 30 people died in a seventh day of conflict, most of them in Lebanon.

US President George W Bush has meanwhile accused Syria of trying to use the crisis to return to Lebanon.

"Syria is trying to get back into Lebanon, it looks like to me," Mr Bush said in Washington.

"It's essential that the government of Lebanon survives this crisis. We've worked hard to free - and we meaning the international community - worked hard to free Lebanon from Syrian influence."

The US state department refused to confirm comments by an Israeli ambassador that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice would travel to the region on Friday.

Israel launched its assault and blockade last Wednesday after the two soldiers were captured.

About 230 Lebanese people have been killed since then - the majority of them were civilians, but the toll includes about 30 soldiers. The number of Hezbollah militants killed is not known.

Twenty-five Israelis have died - 13 civilians and 12 members of the military.

Israel has frequently blamed Syria and Iran for arming and backing Hezbollah, but Mr Olmert's comments were the first explicit claim of Tehran's direct involvement in the capture of the soldiers, correspondents say.

Mr Olmert said the timing of the incident was not an accident, and the international community at the G8 summit in Russia had fallen for it - discussing Lebanon rather than Iran's nuclear programme.
So there we have it. Iran; Nukes; G8 getting distracted from Iran; maybe they're right.
The NYT has thiss article:
“The Iranians are gambling that there won’t be a military attack against them,” said one senior European official who spoke on condition of anonymity, under diplomatic rules. “Iran is trying to say, ‘Nothing is possible without me.’ And for the moment, the nuclear issue is forgotten.”

Indeed, action on a resolution at the United Nations Security Council critical of Iran for failing to suspend its uranium enrichment activities is essentially is on hold because of the crisis in the Middle East.

Iran’s language is no harsher than past statements by its leaders against Israel, and the approach may fail miserably if Israel crushes Hezbollah. But Iran’s unconditional defense of the militia has convinced the United States and many European and Arab governments that Iran is fueling the crisis to project power — whether or not Iran directly inspired or approved Hezbollah’s actions against Israel in the first place.

On Tuesday, Iran made new threats against Israel. At a government-sanctioned demonstration in Tehran, Gholam Ali Haddad Adel, the speaker of Parliament, warned, “Israel’s northern cities are within the range of Hezbollah’s missiles, and no part of Israel will be safe.”

The crowd of nearly 2,000 demonstrators replied with chants of “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!”

As part of the drama of the day, demonstrators read a statement asking the government to help them join Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon, Iran’s state-run television reported.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s spiritual leader and the country’s most powerful figure, said in a speech on Sunday that Israeli strikes in Lebanon and the Palestinian territories proved how “the presence of Zionists in the region is a satanic and cancerous presence and an infected tumor for the entire world of Islam.”
The irony? I'm thinking of one. How about this?
The Iraninas are Persians, who in turn are 'Aryan', unlike their Arab muslim counterparts. Having an 'Aryan' nation vehemently espousing the genocide of Jews isn't the first time it's happened in history, is it?

Team Kim Jong-Il
The North Koreans have mobilised for war. It's the first time they're taking these steps since March 1993 when they pulled out of the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty. They are taking these steps in response to the recent UN Security Council resolutions condemning the missile strikes.

Joys of Joys.

2006/07/18

Energy Superpower

The Wrong Direction


When the most important energy discussions are heading out towards figuring out how to get out of the carbon energy market and into the hydrogen energy market, we find that the PM of Australia is longingly wanting to become a giant of Carbon energy exports.
The Prime Minister's vision would see Australia dramatically increase its share of the world's market, taking advantage of growing international insecurity about energy and soaring prices.

He said Australia's energy exports were forecast to grow to around $45 billion in 2006-07, more than three times what was earned last year from meat, grains and wool combined.

"As an efficient, reliable supplier, Australia has a massive opportunity to increase its share of global energy trade," he told a Committee for Economic Development of Australia lunch in Sydney.

In a long speech that also called for greater national water reform and more water recycling, Mr Howard gave a nod to fossil fuels' contribution to rising global temperatures and changing weather. But he continued to reject both the Kyoto Protocol and carbon emissions trading or a carbon price as a way of dealing with climate change, preferring instead to rely on as yet commercially unproven carbon capture and storage technology.

"The Government's energy policy framework unapologetically emphasises the role of new low-emission technologies to deliver a sustainable greenhouse outcome and it unapologetically seeks to preserve the economic value of our energy resources at a time of soaring global demand," he said.

Opposition and green groups said Mr Howard's promises were illusory because his vision took no account of the rising economic and environmental damage posed by climate change.

"There is a limited 'golden age' to send Australian minerals out the door," said a Greenpeace energy campaigner, Catherine Fitzpatrick.

"If we continue along this path [of heavy reliance on fossil fuels] we will have a cataclysmic climate outcome," she said, adding that so-called low-emission technologies would use a large amount of energy to "clean" the dirty energy generated by coal.

The Labor spokesman on the environment, Anthony Albanese, said greenhouse gas emissions would not fall without market-based mechanisms that would put a price on carbon.

"If the Prime Minister was serious [about climate change] he would follow the lead of the Australian Business Roundtable on Climate Change, which showed the longer we delay action the greater the cost to the economy," he said. "There is no recognition [in the speech] that we live in a carbon-constrained world … it's just business as usual."


At least the Opposition parties get it. The energy issue is many-tiered so it's not universally bad to develop some capacity for fossil fuels on the proviso that it is used to extend our future technologies into the hydrogen fuel economy. Even so, we don't get that feeling from the PM's speech and there's the rub. He's talking about nuclear fission as a fuel we must embrace. Again, that's a little scary too. The problems of nuclear fission technology lie not so much in the technology itself but the need for constant human supervision; and so it fails when the human operators fail. History strongly suggests humans fail at some point - and the consequences of that are a lot more frightening with good reason.


The other obvious problem with the energy superpower concept is that you don't see Saudi Arabia and Iraq having become 'energy superpowers' based on their export of oil over all these years. The oil wealth only created a rich few and the populations of those countries are not exactly well-off as a result. Ditto for most other energy exporters, Rather, the track record indicates that all this will do will make a select few rich before the whole carbon energy system comes tumbling down. It's nothing to aim for given the resouces we've got.
Shuttle Lands Safelly


The Space Shuttle Discovery landed safely.
Discovery landed at Kennedy Space Center at 9:14 a.m. in only the second shuttle flight since the 2003 Columbia disaster killed seven astronauts.
"Welcome back, Discovery, and congratulations on a great mission," Mission Control told shuttle commander Steven Lindsey after Discovery rolled to a stop.

"It was a great mission, a really great mission, and enjoyed the entry and the landing," Lindsey replied.

The smooth landing was sure to leave NASA officials jubilant, after conquering the chronic threat of foam chunks that break off the external fuel tank during launch - still a problem, but not a serious one in this mission.

The shuttle came in from the south, swooping over the Pacific, Yucatan Peninsula, Gulf of Mexico and across Florida to cap a 5.3-million-mile journey that began on the Fourth of July.

A last-minute buildup of clouds led NASA to switch the shuttle's direction for landing. By the time Discovery approached, it was so cloudy, Lindsey couldn't spot the runway until about a minute before landing.

A couple of minutes out, NASA made a racket to keep birds out of the way of the approaching spacecraft. Car horns blared, and the sound of gunshots and firecrackers erupted.

At touchdown, shouts and whistles came from the few hundred astronauts' relatives and space center workers at the runway. "It's exciting to see the shuttle back," said astronaut Scott Kelly, the identical twin brother of Discovery's co-pilot, Mark Kelly.

"We're back on track with maybe flying the shuttle regularly here starting again in August."

Atlantis is up next with a crew poised to carry out assembly of the international space station, a task put on the back burner after Columbia.
I guess that's what really counts. Compared to last time, it was a lot less scary.

Hotel Orbitalia? Hotel Balloonia?


A private consortium is trying to build an inflatable object to float up to Low Earth Orbit. It's a going to be a hotel. Here's the article.
Bigelow Aerospace’s Genesis 1 module activated its compressed air tanks to inflate the skin as planned, and is now sending back low-res photos to earth.

The concept of an inflatable craft was conceived by Nasa in the 60s, and is much cheaper than standard spaceships as it takes up less room on the launch vehicle.

The only inhabitants of the 15ft by 8ft module are cockroaches, but the company is planning two more missions over the next year and believes a full-sized version for humans could be ready by 2010.

Fears that a giant bouncy castle might be a little prone to being punctured by space debris are apparently unfounded – the walls contain Kevlar, which is used in bullet proof vests, and the internal temperature is said to be a pleasant 26 degrees.

Founder Robert Bigelow is also trying to stoke up competition by launching ‘America’s Space Prize’, which is offering $50 million to any US company that can create a craft that can take 5 people into space. Looks like long weekends in space might be on the cards soon.
Clearly, the space race has now been privatised.

Battery Operated

This is a battery operated aircraft. That's right.
This aircraft flew 59 seconds for 391m using 160 A batteries, recording a maximum altitude of 5,2m. It spans 31m, and weighs 54kg. It was flown by Tomohiro Kamiya of Tokyo as part of a University project.
The craft was sponsored by Matsushita Electric, othrwise known to us as Panasonic. I guess they brought the batteries.

2006/07/17

The World At War Week

Korean Missile Fallout
I've been avoiding making a mention of the North Korean missile issue because when it comes right down to it, I don't think the world has taken note just how dangerous the North Korean Regime still is and so one comes over like Pandora on Paranoia pills. I can' say for certain that Iraq under Saddam truly was a 'rogue' nation, but North Korea certainly qualifies for that title.

Last week, they fired 7 missiles as a test. The thinking goes, they are seeking a nuclear deterrent because if there's one thing the Americans won't do, it is attack a nuclear capable nation. So they, like Iran are busily working on a nuclear insurance policy. Understandably, The USA and Japanese want something done, but Russia and China are dragging their heels. What on earth do they see as an upside to a nuclear North Korea, is not entirely clear.

However, by the end of the week, all parties agreed that they should sanction North Korea. North Korea of course 'rejected the vote', though what that means is not much.
North Korea said on Sunday it was not bound by a U.N. Security Council resolution imposing weapons-related sanctions on it and insisted the country would "bolster its war deterrent" in every way.

The Security Council had acted with "irresponsibility" by voting unanimously for a resolution requiring nations to prevent North Korea from acquiring dangerous weapons, an unnamed North Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman said.

"Our Republic will bolster its war deterrent for self-defence in every way, by all means and methods, now that the situation has reached the worst phase due to the extremely hostile act of the U.S.," the spokesman was quoted as saying by the official KCNA news agency.

North Korea refers to its military build-up and its weapons of mass destruction programmes as its war deterrent, saying the U.S. military presence and drills on the Korean peninsula are a prelude to war against it.

Washington says its 30,000 troops are deployed under an alliance with Seoul to deter a military threat from the North.

Chinese President Hu Jintao called on Sunday for a resumption of six-party talks aimed at persuading North Korea to give up its nuclear weapons programme.
Talk about going to hell in a basket. China wants North Korea to be a deterrent against the Japan-USA alliance. The question they're not answering is "Do the really want to put Kim Jong-Il in charge of the swtich that could start nuclear annhilation?" Russia and the USA are going to be cautious because they might be the ones having to send in ground troops at some point.
During Saturday's U.N. session, North Korea's ambassador Pak Gil Yon angrily denounced the Security Council resolution as "unjustifiable," and accused the United States of what he called "strategic blackmail."

Rice said she expected this kind of response.

"Now, I'm not surprised that the first reaction of the North Koreans is to reject it," she said. "That's the way that the North Koreans are. But they've got to be a little surprised at the strength of the resolution. They've got to be a little surprised that the unity of the community was maintained."

The U.N. resolution was also supported by Russia, another country that holds a Security Council veto. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told CNN's Late Edition the resolution signified a balanced approach toward Pyongyang.

"The Security Council just ended a very difficult negotiations, achieving a balance, which very strongly demands from North Korea to stick to its previous commitments, but at the same time, does not threaten North Korea, which would be entirely counter-productive," said Sergei Lavrov. "Let's give some time for this resolution to work."

Japan and the United States had pushed for a version of the resolution that referred to Chapter Seven of the U.N. Charter, which makes a Security Council resolution enforceable by military action. But China and Russia were among those who opposed earlier drafts of the measure. The final version calls for sanctions, but does not include references to military action.
At some point they're going to have to figure out how to bring North Korea in from the cold. The Russians and Chinese had better figure out a plan because clearly the alternative is going to be armed confrontation, thanks to the outlandish North Korean belligerence, even if all parties try to stave it off by talks. Going forwards, there's just not enough good faith to save this situation.

The Hills Are Alive With The Sound Of Bombings
That would be the Lebanese hill north of the Israeli border.
How did we get to this point? Here's a quick chronolgy.
As far as we can tell, Israel is trying to force everybody's hand including those of Iran and the USA by going after Hamas and Hezbollah at the same time. This is producing no amount of joy.

Israel operates on the principle that anyone who attacks it will pay a price and argues that, like it or not, this is part of what the Middle East is about.

However, it has another agenda and the worse its casualties, the more it is propelled towards trying to fulfil it.

This agenda is to disrupt and reduce the power of Hezbollah, with whom it has old scores to settle.

It is also the main threat to any of Israel's borders and indeed, as Israel has again discovered, to some of its major population centres.

Just how far it is prepared to go remains unclear.

The Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, for whom this is a baptism of fire, has spoken of "far-reaching consequences" after the attack on Haifa claimed eight lives, but has not been specific.

Haifa was a blow for Israel, as the attack on its warship was. Such blows will influence Israeli intentions.
So it's time to settle some scores rather than endure another 'Peace Process'. Sort of a 21st Century political version of lancing the boil. A lot of puss is going to come out of this one.
The risk of course is that the conflict will spread.

Israel is already laying down a barrage of blame on Syria and Iran, both backers of Hezbollah.

But will that become a barrage of fire as well, especially aimed at Syria? Iran is too far away.

Israel could undertake some kind of warning or punishment strike just to remind Syria which is the strongest power in the region - it has done that before - but it depends on how far it wants to take this.

In the meantime, diplomacy is bogged down.

The United States is reluctant to act and has lost influence in the Arab world over Iraq. It is giving Israel some time to accomplish some at least of its goals. There is no Henry Kissinger on the horizon.

The G8 has issued a compromise statement that does call for the release of the Israeli soldiers, restraint by Israel in Lebanon and a withdrawal of its forces from Gaza.

Is that a hint that the US has a time limit for all this? Or is it a green light for Israel to carry on with what it is currently doing?

A widening of the confrontation is not inevitable. Sometimes the Middle East does draw back from the brink.
That does not sound promising at all.
None of the parties have a better plan on a better way to resolve their differences. It's all about airing of grievances without addressing the other's. And ther are those who are committed to violence because there's nothing but violence in them. It's a hard terrain to navigate towards peace.

2006/07/14

Fangaroo


Scientists have made some interesting discoveries regarding pre-historic marsupials.
SYDNEY, Australia - Forget cute, cuddly marsupials. Paleontologists say they have found the fossilized remains of a fanged killer kangaroo and what they describe as a "demon duck of doom."

A University of New South Wales team said the fearsome fossils were among 20 previously unknown species uncovered at a site in Australia's northwest Queensland state.

Professor Michael Archer said Wednesday that the remains of a meat-eating kangaroo with wolflike fangs were found, as well as a galloping kangaroo with long forearms that could not hop like a modern kangaroo.

"Because they didn't hop, these were galloping kangaroos, with big, powerful forelimbs. Some of them had long canines (fangs) like wolves," Archer told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

Vertebrate paleontologist Sue Hand said modern kangaroos look almost nothing like their ferocious forebears, which lived between 10 million and 20 million years ago.

The species found at the dig had "well muscled-in teeth, not for grazing. These things had slicing crests that could have crunched through bone and sliced off flesh," Hand said.

The team also found prehistoric lungfish and large ducklike birds.

"Very big birds ... more like ducks, earned the name 'demon duck of doom', some at least may have been carnivorous as well," Hand told ABC radio.

Archer said the team was studying the fossils to better understand how they were affected by changing climates in the Miocene epoch between 5 million and 24 million years ago.
The Demon Duck of Doom. Now I know what my nightmares have been about all these years. :)

2006/07/13

Genius

Two Types According To Economist
There are the early-bloomers and late-bloomers. Here's the article from Wired. It's interesting reading.

Galenson collected data, ran the numbers, and drew conclusions. He selected 42 contemporary American artists and researched the auction prices for their works. Then, controlling for size, materials, and other variables, he plotted the relationship between each artist’s age and the value of his or her paintings. On the vertical axis, he put the price each painting fetched at auction; on the horizontal axis, he noted the age at which the artist created the work. When he tacked all 42 charts to his office wall, he saw two distinct shapes.

For some artists, the curve hit an early peak followed by a gradual decline. People in this group created their most valuable works in their youth – Andy Warhol at 33, Frank Stella at 24, Jasper Johns at 27. Nothing they made later ever reached those prices. For others, the curve was more of a steady rise with a peak near the end. Artists in this group produced their most valuable pieces later in their careers – Willem de Kooning at 43, Mark Rothko at 54, Robert Motherwell at 72. But their early work wasn’t worth much.

Galenson decided to test the robustness of his conclusions about artists’ life cycles by looking at variables other than price. Art history textbooks presumably reflect the consensus among scholars about which works are important. So he and his research assistants gathered up textbooks and began tabulating the illustrations as a way of inferring importance. (The methodology is analogous to Google’s PageRank system: The more books that “linked” to a particular piece of art, the more important it was assumed to be.)

When Galenson’s team correlated the frequency of an image with the age at which the artist created it, the same two contrasting graphs reappeared. Some artists were represented by dozens of pieces created in their twenties and thirties but relatively few thereafter. For other artists, the reverse was true.

Galenson, a classic library rat, began reading biographies of the artists and accounts by art critics to add some qualitative meat to these quantitative bones. And then the theory came alive. These two patterns represented two types of artists – indeed, two types of humans.

The insight was so powerful that Galenson soon turned his full attention to the subject. He elaborated his theory in 24 additional papers and set down his findings in a pair of books, Painting Outside the Lines: Patterns of Creativity in Modern Art, published in 2001, and Old Masters and Young Geniuses: The Two Life Cycles of Artistic Creativity, published earlier this year.

Pablo Picasso and Paul Cézanne are the archetypes of the Galensonian universe. Picasso was a conceptual innovator. He broke with the past to invent a revolutionary style, Cubism, that jolted art in a new direction. His Demoiselles d’Avignon, regarded by critics as the most important painting of the past 100 years, appears in more art history textbooks than any other 20th-century piece. Picasso completed Demoiselles when he was 26. He lived into his nineties and produced many other well-known works, of course, but Galenson’s analysis shows that of all the Picassos that appear in textbooks, nearly 40 percent are those he completed before he turned 30.



Now that it is spelt out, it seems bloody obvious.
Japanese poet Shiki Masaoka carried out a similar assessment of Japanese writers back in the late 19th century and concluded a writer ought to live longer. Those who are long-lived produced the most important body of work, according to Masaoka. Of course he was dead at 35. Yet, he was a conceptualist who radically updated Japanese poetry, and one could say he had done the big thing that radically redefined his field by the time of his earrly death.

I guess, while the claim is intuitively obvious, it needed a rigorous empirical examination.

2006/07/11

Not A Good Outcome



Like I said some months before: Launching rockets is difficult stuff to do.
The INSAT-4c went up in smoke as GSLV FO2 rocket veered off course and exploded 60seconds after lift-off.


SRIHARIKOTA (AP), JULY 10:A day after the Agni-III ballistic missile failed to meet test expectations, India’s space programme took a knocking when the Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV FO2), carrying the INSAT-4C communication satellite, veered off course and exploded 60 seconds after lift-off.
The three-stage rocket burst into flames during the first stage operation, a minute after lift-off at 5.38 pm from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre in Sriharikota, some 80 km from Chennai.

The failure of the Rs 256 crore-mission was being attributed to pressure in one of the four strap-on motors dropping to zero in the first stage operation, causing the GSLV to “deviate slightly” from the designed trajectory.

“This is one of the rarest phenomena and could be due to a problem in one of the strap-ons which led to the mission’s failure,” said a crestfallen G Madhavan Nair, ISRO chairman, while briefing the media after the launch mishap.

“The problem developed in the course of the first stage. After the deviation, we gave the ‘Destruct’ command because we had to safeguard locals,” he said, adding that the debris had fallen into the sea.

“A quick look at the preliminary findings show that of the four strap-on motors, pressure in one of them dropped to zero. The other three functioned normally,” said Madhavan Nair. This caused the deviation in the trajectory. While four degrees of angular error was within the normal limit, the vehicle went off the path by 10 degrees.

"Until 60 seconds, we received huge data on the telemetry. But it has to be analysed and this process has been initiated. We will know what exactly caused the failure in the next few days,” he said.
According to the ISRO chief, work on another INSAT-4 satellite was on and “we will have a successful launch within a year”. This would be a heavier satellite and would be launched from Kourou in French Guiana.
It's not an easy road ahead.
El-Rayo X Specs


This article came in from Pleiades.
It's really something.
Adverts for x-ray specs have tantalised kids throughout the decades. Sadly the reality is always a pair of useless plastic glasses, but this could all change due to a breakthrough made at Imperial College London. By exploiting the way that atoms move in solids the researchers have made solid materials turn completely transparent. 'This real life x-ray specs effect relies on a property of matter that is usually ignored that the electrons it contains move in a wave-like way', says Chris Phillips. 'What we have learnt is how to control these waves directly'.

The secret to this breakthrough at Imperial College London is specially patterned crystals made up of nanoscale boxes that hold electrons. 'Basically we have made 'designer atoms'', says Chris. 'By choosing the size and shape of our little boxes, we can use the rules of quantum mechanics to choose the energy levels of the electrons that are trapped inside them'. When light is shone on these crystals it becomes entangled at a molecular level rather than being absorbed, causing the material to become transparent. 'You can think of the effect as similar to the way that the peaks and troughs of water waves cancel each other out to create calm water', explains Mark Frogley. 'In the materials created it is the wave patterns of the electrons that cancel each other allowing light to travel through the material and making it transparent'. At the moment the effect can only be produced in a lab under specific conditions but future applications could include seeing through rubble at earthquake sites, or looking at parts of the body obscured by bone.


So it may become possible to see through objects after all.

Spy Blogs
Here's another article from Pleiades.

Launched in 2001, Army Knowledge Online is Yahoo! for grunts. All the things that make life on the Net interesting and useful are on AKO. Every soldier has an account, and each unit has its own virtual workspace. Soldiers in my reserve unit are scattered throughout Texas, and we're physically together only once a month. AKO lets us stay linked around the clock.

Another innovative program is the Center for Army Lessons Learned, basically an �berblog staffed by experts. Soldiers can post white papers on subjects ranging from social etiquette at Iraqi funerals to surviving convoy ambushes. A search for "improvised explosive device" yields more than 130 hits. The center's articles are vetted by the staff for accuracy and usefulness, and anyone in the Army can submit.

Unfortunately, the intelligence community has not kept up with the Army. The 15 agencies of the community - ranging from the armed services to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency - maintain separate portals, separate data, and separate people. The bad guys exploit the gaps, and your safety is on the line. So if all us knuckle-draggers in the Army can use technology to make ourselves better, why can't all the big brains at Langley and Foggy Bottom do the same?

The first step toward reform: Encourage blogging on Intelink. When I Google "Afghanistan blog" on the public Internet, I find 1.1 million entries and tons of useful information. But on Intelink there are no blogs. Imagine if the experts in every intelligence field were turned loose - all that's needed is some cheap software. It's not far-fetched to picture a top-secret CIA blog about al Qaeda, with postings from Navy Intelligence and the FBI, among others. Leave the bureaucratic infighting to the agency heads. Give good analysts good tools, and they'll deliver outstanding results.

And why not tap the brainpower of the blogosphere as well? The intelligence community does a terrible job of looking outside itself for information. From journalists to academics and even educated amateurs - there are thousands of people who would be interested and willing to help. Imagine how much traffic an official CIA Iraq blog would attract. If intelligence organizations built a collaborative environment through blogs, they could quickly identify credible sources, develop a deep backfield of contributing analysts, and engage the world as a whole. How cool would it be to gain "trusted user" status on a CIA blog?

Sort of promising, but I just can't imagine the CIA wanting my opinion on anything. :)

Pleiades also sent in this article about the US Military trying to shape opinion on Iraq and Afghanistan throuh blogs.

In a bid to find new ways to influence public opinion about U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a small media affairs team in Tampa has burrowed into the mushrooming cyber world of blogs and persuaded hundreds of Web sites -- which then link to thousands of other sites -- to post content prepared by military public affairs officials.

Since last July, the Florida-based U.S. Central Command’s public affairs staff -- in an effort recently praised by Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld for its innovation -- has been initiating contact with editors of Web sites that cover operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, offering the same news releases and stories written by military officials that are made available to journalists affiliated with traditional media outlets.

In addition, this CENTCOM “electronic media engagement team” encourages these blogs to post a direct link -- along with the command’s insignia -- back to CENTCOM’s main Web site.

To date, more than 300 blogs have posted links to the command’s public affairs page, which have directed millions of viewers to CENTCOM’s site, command officials say. The blogs with direct links to CENTCOM’s site are linked to another 9,300 blogs. This second band of Web sites then link to another 270,000 blogs, providing a potentially exponential reach.

“It’s an incredible way to communicate with the public,” said Lt. Col. Richard McNorton, a CENTCOM spokesman, who oversees a team of two young, enlisted staff members who work full time on the blogs.

It has generated new traffic to the CENTCOM Web site, he said, and paved a new path for pushing content to the public that bypasses traditional print and broadcast media outlets.

That's what they are! They're content pushers. :)

2006/07/10

Weekend Shuffle

Italy Wins The World Cup: They Wuz Lucky

Here's the report:
France 1 Italy 1 (after extra-time)
(Italy won 5-3 on penalties)
ITALY exorcised the demons of 1994 in emphatic style this morning, winning a fourth World Cup final by defeating France in a shoot-out after having been outplayed for much of the match.

Italy, with a 0-3 record in World Cup shoot-outs - having lost the 1994 final against Brazil, in the only previous final shoot-out; a 1990 semi-final against Argentina; and a 1998-quarter-final against France – this time was faultless from the spot.

Andrea Pirlo, Marco Materazzi, Daniele De Rossi, Alessandro Del Piero and, finally, Fabio Grosso each held his nerve to give France goalkeeper Fabien Barthez no chance.

Italy captain Fabio Cannavaro said the victory would ease the pain of wide-ranging match-fixing scandals that have dragged his country's football reputation through the mud in recent months.

"Italy have wanted this for a long time and, coming after everything that has happened in the past few months, it was really needed,'' Cannavaro said.

"Its a fantastic feeling. My son asked to sleep in my bed last night, but I told him he could share it with me and the trophy soon."

Substitute France striker David Trezeguet, like Italy legend Roberto Baggio in 1994, will be remembered as the man who lost the final.

Baggio's chipped penalty, perhaps the most famous miss in shott-out history, went over the bar, but Trezeguet, who plays for scandal-hit Italian Serie A club, Juventus, saw his spot kick, France's second of the shoot-out, crashed back from the woodwork after Italy goalkeeper Gianluigi Buffon had dived the wrong way.

Sylvain Wiltord, Eric Abidal and Willy Sagnol were on target in the shoot-out for France, which will lament forever the fact that Zinedine Zidane, on target from the spot to give Les Bleus the lead in the first half, was not among the participants in the shoot-out.

Zidane, the legend who inspired France's final success against Brazil in 1998, and who drove Les Bleus through the knockout stages of Germany 2006 with a series of divine performances, suffered a terrible fate in the last match of his career, shamefully sent off in extra-time after he was given a straight red card for head-butting Materazzi after the Italy centre-back said something that clearly riled Zizou.

Perhaps frustration had something to do with Zidane's reaction for - the goal and an extra-time header, to which Buffon made a tremendous, acrobatic right-handed save, apart - the midfield master was subdued throughout, dominated by the marking of his Italy counterparts and unable to influence proceedings as he and France wanted.

"To see him finish his career in this way is sad. He has had a great career and a great World Cup." France coach Raymond Domenech said of Zidane.

Argentine referee Horacio Elizondo missed the headbutt but Buffon remonstrated furiously with the assistant referee, who called over the man in the middle.

After a lengthy consultation, the referee raced to the middle of the pitch and stunned Zidane with the red card.

How different the match seemed for France more than two hours earlier, when Zidane put Les Bleus ahead from the penalty spot.

Mr Elizondo gifted France the opportunity to open the scoring in the seventh minute, awarding a penalty kick after Materazzi had appeared to move across Florent Malouda.

Television replays showed that Materazzi, the man sent off in the second-round match against Australia, may have been unfortunate as he seemed to pull out of the challenge, but that mattered nought to Zidane, who sent Buffon the wrong way with a cheeky chipped penalty that crossed the goal line via the underside of the crossbar.

Italy was unbowed conceding its first goal by an opponent in the tournament – the only other goal it had conceded at that stage, in the 1-1 group-stage draw against the US, was an own goal by Cristian Zaccardo – and the Azzurri got back into the game as Pirlo dropped deeper to assume the playmaking role and Gennaro Gattuso won an increasing number of tackles.

Italy, which dominated the remainder of the first half, equalised from a Pirlo corner kick, Materazzi towering above his marker, Patrick Vieira, on the edge of the six-yard box to power a header past Barthez and midfield player Franck Ribery on the left goal post.

France experienced aerial trouble from set pieces throughout the game, and Italy was unlucky not to take the lead 10 minutes from half-time, striker Luca Toni this time climbing highest to meet a Pirlo corner only to see his header thump against the crossbar with Barthez beaten.

Toni thought he had scored in the 61st minute, heading the ball past Barthez from another free-kick, but the linesman cut short his celebration, raising the flag in a marginal decision.

In between those chances, France failed to deal with a short corner worked by Pirlo and Mauro Camoranesi, and centre-back William Gallas knew little about his clearance when Italy captain Fabio Cannavaro's goal-bound header hit him shortly after half-time.

France, with Zidane inspirational only by his presence on the pitch, nevertheless worked itself back into the match, dominating the remainder of play as Italy seemed to lose shape as it proved unable to retain possession.

Malouda on the left and Ribery on the right, and later more through the centre, began to get forward more, and their pace caused numerous problems for the Italy defence.

Ribery in the 51st minute sparked a sweeping counter-attack after Fabio Grosso lost the ball in an attacking position, breaking on the right before feeding Zidane, whose pass put Malouda into space in the penalty area.

If France was fortunate to be awarded its penalty kick in the first half, it was now unfortunate not to get a second as Italy right-back Granula Zumbrota clearly fouled the Frenchman without getting close to the ball.

Striker Thierry Henry, previously a peripheral figure, also began to drop deeper to collect the ball, and he forced Buffon into smart saves after dazzling runs on either side of the pitch, first skipping past four tackles on the left and then twisting and turning past Grosso, Camoranesi and Materazzi on the right.

Buffon had to drop smartly to his left to prevent another Henry shot in the 62nd minute, the effort coming after good work by Claude Micelle.

France continued to dominate in extra-time, with Ribery and Malouda continuing to cause Italy problems on the flanks.

The wide midfield players combined on the left 10 minutes into the first period of extra-time, exchanging passes on the edge of the penalty area to fashion a chance for Ribery, who stabbed a shot just wide of the right-hand goal post.

Domenech said he could not take any satisfaction from the fact that France outplayed Italy for long periods.

"I am deeply disappointed," he said.

"On the merits of the match, we deserved it.

"Only victory is beautiful and we missed out.

"We can say it wasn't too bad but it is the Italians who are the world champions. They played for the penalties because that was the only option for them."
Seriously, they were lucky to even get there if you ask me. They were starring down the barrel of the gun against Australia. France cracked under the pressure. I mean, a win is a win, but they were lucky they got out of jail twice having played fairly negative games.

Anyway, a final between France and Italy? I didn't bother to watch the thing because there's no way that both teams could lose. :)

Encroaching On Borg And Sampras


Meanwhile In Tennis, Roger Federer made it 4 Wimbledons in a row.
World No.1 Roger Federer has finally turned the tables on rival Rafael Nadal, ending a five-match losing streak against the Spaniard to claim the Wimbledon title for the fourth year in succession.

In their most recent battle Nadal had extended his winning streak on clay to 60 matches by defeating Federer to claim the French Open title for the second year in a row, but Nadal was unable to continue his dominance on Federer's preferred surface.

Federer made a brilliant start to the match and took the opening set without conceding a game, before the next two sets both went to tie-breakers, with Federer taking the second and Nadal the third, but it was Federer who went on to win 6-0 7-6 (7-5) 6-7 (2-7) 6-3.
Pretty amazing when you think about the likelihood of seeing 3 players of this calibre in one's own lifetime.

The Weekend Dumpdown

INSAT-4C Satellite


The Indian Space programme is about to launch its rocket GSLV with the INSAT 4C satellite from Satish Dhawan Space Centre.
This is the first launch of GSLV from the state-of-the-art Second Launch Pad (SLP) at SDSC. SLP, which was commissioned in May 2005 with the successful launch of PSLV-C6 is designed to reduce the occupancy time for the integration and launch.

The GSLV would lift off with the 2168 kg INSAT-4C, the heaviest in its class, at 4 30 pm tomorrow, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) chairman G Madhavan Nair said.

The 49-metre-tall, 414 tonne GSLV is a three stage vehicle. The first stage, GS1, comprises a core motor with 138 tonne of solid propellants and four strap-on motors, each with 42 tonnes of hypergolic liquid propellant. The second stage has 39 tonne of the same hypergolic liquid propellant. The third (GS3) is a cryogenic stage with 12.6 tonne of liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid hydrogen (LH2). INSAT 4C, the second satellite in the INSAT 4 series, would give a boost to Direct-to-Home television services, video picture transmission and digital satellite news gathering. It will also provide space for National Informatics Centre's VSAT connectivity.
Call me 'rocket boy' but this is exciting. We wish them godspeeed.

Space Walking


The shuttle crew did a space walk to make certain there were no significant damages to the shuttle.
British-born astronaut Piers Sellers and American Michael Fossum took turns strapping their feet on to a small platform and dangling from the end of a 30m boom that would allow astronauts to reach every part of a shuttle.

"It's like being in a very slow elevator," Sellers radioed to ground controllers as he rode atop the end of the boom, which is a combination of the Space Shuttle Discovery's 15m robot arm and a 15m extension.

The exercise, performed at 28,000km/h, 357km above the Earth, was part of NASA's efforts to recover from the 2003 Columbia disaster and make certain there were options for repairing a damaged shuttle before it returned into the atmosphere. Seven astronauts on Columbia in 2003 died without knowing their shuttle was critically damaged when insulation foam fell off during liftoff. The vessel broke apart over Texas as it returned to Earth. "Hopefully, we never have to use it but we have the capability if we ever need to," flight director Tony Ceccacci said after the boom test.
It seems the sshuttle is a-okay for the return. This is much better than the last effort.
The last re-entry scared the bejesus out of me.

Hayabusa Debrief


Sorry this one's in Japanese, but it's from he JAXA symposium. The salient point is that the asteroid-visiting Hayabusa mission was given better and fairer coverage overseas than in Japan.
サイエンスに、感謝されたはやぶさプロジェクト
 「はやぶさ」の評価は日本よりも、海外の方が高かったと、山根氏が「サイエンス」誌の最新号を壇上で掲げながら、川口プロジェクトマネージャーと、話を始めた。サイエンスの編集長は、はやぶさプロジェクトの偉業をたたえるとともに、小惑星の地質の情報が分かったことで、地球に小惑星がぶつかる可能性があるとき、それを避けるための実際の情報として使えると、感謝の意を表している。アメリカや、ヨーロッパでは、恐竜を滅ぼした原因と言われる小惑星の地球への衝突に対して、真剣に回避を考えている組織がある。

 サイエンスが日本の探査機の成果を大々的に取り上げるのも異例なら、その成果に対して感謝の意を表するのも大変異例のことであり、日本の研究技術レベルに大きな誇りを感じると、山根氏が感激気味に話した。

なぜ意味があるのか
 地球−太陽−いとかわの距離はほぼ等しいが、なぜそんなところにいって、サンプルを持ち帰る意味があるのかを、川口氏が話した。だれも着陸したことがない、火星より遠い小惑星いとかわに着陸し、かえってくることも大きな意味を持つが、地球や、太陽系のできたころの姿が、保存されている。小惑星のサンプルを持ち帰ることができれば、地球の火山活動でマントルから出てきた、かんらん石などの成分と、比べることで実証できる。

 はやぶさは、いとかわの地面に、弾丸を打ち込んで、サンプルを吸い上げる実験には失敗したが、弾丸を打ち出す部屋は3つあり、弾丸も3つ。ひとつ打つごとに部屋が回転して、サンプルを吸い込む仕組みになっている。はやぶさが地面に着いたとき塵が舞い上がったりして、それがサンプルの取り込み口から自然に入る可能性もある。アメリカのスターダスト計画が、今年彗星の尻尾から持ち帰ったサンプルは、ミクロンオーダーだが大変貴重な情報になった。はやぶさにも、ほこり程度でも入っていれば、大変な成果だと思う。
The projected recovery of the asteroid sample will be in 2010.

2006/07/06

Ken Lay Is Dead


I feel obliged to note that Enron fraudster Ken Lay has died, aged 64.
Having mentioned his name a few months back, I feel obliged to note his passing.
The 64-year-old died early Wednesday after being taken to a hospital near his mountain home. Dr. Robert Kurtzman, the forensic pathologist who conducted the autopsy in Grand Junction, Colorado, said there was no evidence of foul play in his death.

"The post-mortem examination revealed that Mr. Lay had severe coronary artery disease," Kurtzman said. "There was evidence that he had a heart attack in the past."

Lay was pronounced dead at 3:11 a.m. Wednesday, according to the Pitkin County Sheriff's Department. His pastor, Dr. Steve Wende, of Houston's First United Methodist Church, told reporters earlier that Lay "suffered a massive coronary and died" while spending a week in Aspen with his wife, Linda.

"Apparently, his heart simply gave out," Wende said.
He won't be missed.

2006/07/05

Shuttle Launch On Independence Day 2006



NASA says the shuttle launch is a success.
The Space Shuttle Discovery and its crew of seven astronauts have blasted into orbit on NASA's first launch in a year. The lift-off went ahead despite objections from some within NASA who argued for more fuel tank repairs. Discovery finally cleared the tower after two weather delays and last-minute problems with the insulation foam.

Problems with fuel tank insulation were what doomed the shuttle Columbia and her crew in 2003. A piece of foam the same size as a slice of bread could be seen falling off Discovery during the launch. But experts said it was too small to pose a safety risk.

Discovery is aiming to link up with the International Space Station. But commentators say if anything goes wrong with the mission, it could mean the end of the Shuttle programme, and George W. Bush's plans for further exploration of the Moon and Mars could be in jeopardy.
The modified fuel tank went well, apparently.
"I think the tank performed very, very well indeed," said Wayne Hale, NASA’s space shuttle manager during an evening press briefing here at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC). "We saw nothing that gives us any kind of concern about the health of the crew of the vehicle."

Hale’s comments came after a quick first-look at imagery of Discovery’s launch, arrival in orbit and the jettison of its external tank after the spacecraft and its seven-astronaut STS-121 crew launched into space on July 4 at 2:37:55 p.m. EDT (1837:55 GMT).

During that cursory look at a veritable flood of images, video and radar data, shuttle analysts found seven instances – of which five are related to fuel tank foam debris – of objects falling from Discovery’s launch stack.

"We put the tank under a microscope this time," Hale said. "It did not perform flawlessly, in that we lost some foam off the tank apparently."
Although the Telegraph in the UK is reporting this:
America's accident-prone space programme hit more trouble yesterday when the shuttle Discovery shed several chunks of foam insulation shortly after take-off from Cape Canaveral in Florida.

Nasa said a number of pieces fell from the external fuel tank during the launch but insisted that by then the shuttle and its crew of seven were beyond the point in its flight where the debris could pose a hazard.

"This isn't too abnormal," said Bill Gerstenmaier, the associate administrator for spaceflight. "We fully expected to lose some foam."

Engineers maintained that the flyaway debris was expected to be small and any damage it may have caused would have no extreme consequence to the shuttle at the most dangerous point in its flight, its re-entry to Earth's atmosphere in 11 days.

The flight was delayed twice because of bad weather and there were further last-minute jitters over a chunk of insulation foam that fell from the fuel tank in the build-up to take-off, leaving a 4 in scar at the top of the tank.

After the broken chunk was discovered, Nasa's top engineer and chief of safety wanted to postpone Discovery's launch until the damage had been fixed.
Make of that what you will, but let's hope the whole thing keeps going well, safely.

Wienner Winner


Well, Japan might have had a disappointing first round in the World Cup, but when it comes to Hot Dogging, they have a champ. That's right, Takeru Kobayashi, the 5-time Hot Dog eating champion won his 6th consecutive title downing 54 and 3/4 hotdogs in 12minutes, smashing his previous record of 53 1/2 from 2 years ago.
Thousands of raucous spectators jammed the streets in front of the hot dog stand, a block from the famed Coney Island boardwalk, to watch the competition and Kobayashi — a top-ranked eater who once ate 17.7 pounds of pan-seared cow brains to win $25,000.

His strongest competition was Joey Chestnut, a 220-pound civil engineering student from San Jose, Calif., who set an American record by eating 50 hot dogs during a qualifying tournament in Las Vegas.

Chestnut jumped out to an early lead in the competition, sometimes jamming franks into his mouth with two hands as the crowd roared.

But Chestnut struggled, red-faced, with veins bulging in his forehead, the Japanese star methodically chomped dog after dog, often dipping them in a soft drink before cramming them into his mouth. Kobayashi passed Chestnut with about three minutes left in the contest.

When the clock expired, Chestnut had swallowed 52 Nathan's franks — not quite enough.

Among the other competitors were another favorite, 100-pound Sonya "The Black Widow" Thomas, of Alexandria, Va., who once ate 65 hard boiled eggs in a little more than 6 1/2 minutes, and a local favorite, Eric "Badlands" Booker, a 425-pound subway conductor from Long Island who holds speed-eating records for pies and matzo balls.
Here's a Video.
Here's another Video.
At least it's winning something consistently, but more to the point, the world is a wonderful place.

iCompositions Collaboration
I've got as track with 'seles58' from Italy.
He plays all the amazing fusion guitar and in an *amazingly* bad choice out of my pool of meager talents, I've lent my vocal support.
Here's the link. Check it out.

2006/07/04

The Week That Was


This is my song of the week. It's called 'Had A Friend'
It's a song Brutus and I wrote many moons ago when we had a band-in-passing called The Time Wasters. As you can see it's based on Sharon Stone who 10 years ago was at the peak of her career. I've rewritten some of the words to better suit the times but you get the idea.

Check it out at my artist page on iCompositions.
Download it for your ipod pleasure. :)

The World Cup Schmozzle
Since the Socceroos were eliminated and rediscovering I actually don't like soccer, I've really not kept up with this world-wide sports-fest. I noticed Brazil were downed by France 1-0, which to me says that the scoring system in soccer is somehow *wrong*. Think about all the sporting games one can play. A 1-0 result in soccer must be the most un-indicative score-line of any sport; it's just too crude an index of how the teams performed. Anyway, it just reminds me of why I just think it's a stupid game to follow.

Finding Closure
'T' from my previous work-place organised a get together for the old crew and sure enough I ran into my old boss JD, who utterly gave me the shits towards the dying days of Classroom Video. The funny thing was, he asked me what I've been doing and I told him about Discovery Channel and the rocket launch shoot and the Aquarium shoot in Japan, and suddenly it was like, "oh?"
Well, I guess that makes it "all said and done" doesn't it?

Now, I don't know if I'm going to get more stuff from Discovery or what-not but it's clear to me in the 24 months since I started this blog that I've come some distance so I felt like I shouldn't really give him a hard time about how it all closed down or any of that. I mean, what would be the point? So we chatted about the World Cup and how inconsistent the refereeing had been and that was it.

Modern Listening


I've been listening to the several Paul Weller discs I obtained in Japan. I've particularly been hooked on the 2-disc special edition of 'Stanley Road'. It's got raw vocals and raw guitars and raw drums and still comes up really polished. It's quite an achivement in song-writing as well as arrangement.
Then there's the more recently purchased 'Illumination' and 'Studio 150' discs that have been a revelation. Talk about growing old gracefully.

Recently, Walk-off HBP forwarded me a podcast of Paul Weller. The man sounds like a really boring guy outside of his music. Yet, the more I listen to his stuff, the more I'm drawn into the logic of his arrangement. Some of it is even rubbing off on the way I go about arranging my own stuff.

Though, to put some perspective on all this, some years ago, I played 'Paul Weller's Greatest Hits' to a good friend who said, "I just don't get this. What is it with all these noises? It's music that only you can like."
It is idiosyncratic mod rock - but that's the way I like my rock music.

Fantasy Team Update
My AFL team is in tatters. I have zero roster flexibility left so the rest of the season is watching a train crash in slow-motion.
While the World Cup's been on and my attention not on it totally, my Fantasy basebal team sat atop of the lague for a good 14 days. That was weird. Now that my attention is back on to it, they've fallen offf their perch. Ain't that the way?

From The Pleiades Mailbox
A couple of interesting entries came in so I thought I hould post them up before I forgot.
This one is about Iran and its alleged military nukes. It's written by Seymour Hersh:

In President Bush’s June speech, he accused Iran of pursuing a secret weapons program along with its civilian nuclear-research program (which it is allowed, with limits, under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty). The senior officers in the Pentagon do not dispute the President’s contention that Iran intends to eventually build a bomb, but they are frustrated by the intelligence gaps. A former senior intelligence official told me that people in the Pentagon were asking, “What’s the evidence? We’ve got a million tentacles out there, overt and covert, and these guys”—the Iranians—“have been working on this for eighteen years, and we have nothing? We’re coming up with jack shit.”

A senior military official told me, “Even if we knew where the Iranian enriched uranium was—and we don’t—we don’t know where world opinion would stand. The issue is whether it’s a clear and present danger. If you’re a military planner, you try to weigh options. What is the capability of the Iranian response, and the likelihood of a punitive response—like cutting off oil shipments? What would that cost us?” Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and his senior aides “really think they can do this on the cheap, and they underestimate the capability of the adversary,” he said.

In 1986, Congress authorized the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to act as the “principal military adviser” to the President. In this case, I was told, the current chairman, Marine General Peter Pace, has gone further in his advice to the White House by addressing the consequences of an attack on Iran. “Here’s the military telling the President what he can’t do politically”—raising concerns about rising oil prices, for example—the former senior intelligence official said. “The J.C.S. chairman going to the President with an economic argument—what’s going on here?” (General Pace and the White House declined to comment. The Defense Department responded to a detailed request for comment by saying that the Administration was “working diligently” on a diplomatic solution and that it could not comment on classified matters.)

A retired four-star general, who ran a major command, said, “The system is starting to sense the end of the road, and they don’t want to be condemned by history. They want to be able to say, ‘We stood up.’"

Now that's interesting. Then there's this piece to ponder:
Iran’s geography would also complicate an air war. The senior military official said that, when it came to air strikes, “this is not Iraq,” which is fairly flat, except in the northeast. “Much of Iran is akin to Afghanistan in terms of topography and flight mapping—a pretty tough target,” the military official said. Over rugged terrain, planes have to come in closer, and “Iran has a lot of mature air-defense systems and networks,” he said. “Global operations are always risky, and if we go down that road we have to be prepared to follow up with ground troops.”

The U.S. Navy has a separate set of concerns. Iran has more than seven hundred undeclared dock and port facilities along its Persian Gulf coast. The small ports, known as “invisible piers,” were constructed two decades ago by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards to accommodate small private boats used for smuggling. (The Guards relied on smuggling to finance their activities and enrich themselves.) The ports, an Iran expert who advises the U.S. government told me, provide “the infrastructure to enable the Guards to go after American aircraft carriers with suicide water bombers”—small vessels loaded with high explosives. He said that the Iranians have conducted exercises in the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow channel linking the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and then on to the Indian Ocean. The strait is regularly traversed by oil tankers, in which a thousand small Iranian boats simulated attacks on American ships. “That would be the hardest problem we’d face in the water: a thousand small targets weaving in and out among our ships.”

So don't expect the war machine to jump into action.
There are a lot more interesting gem insights in the article so make sure you don't miss it.


The other article covers controversial Foreign Minister of Japan, Taro Aso and his visit to Australia. A number of Australians are pissed off with this man. It's hard to take issue with their issue.
THE next time Japan's Foreign Minister Taro Aso visits Australia, there are a handful of blokes who would like to talk to him about the time they worked for his dad at the Aso family coalmine. But it would not be a cosy meeting.

The former Aso workers are Australian prisoners of war who in 1945 were forced to endure slave conditions at one of the pits owned by Aso's family business, which dates back to the 19th century. Aso Mining Co (now the Aso Group) was one of many Japanese corporations that illicitly coerced Allied PoWs into heavy labour during the Pacific war.

"I'd like to meet Mr Aso," says Joe Coombs, 85, of Regents Park, Sydney. Coombs is a former infantry corporal and one of nine known prisoners still alive who worked at Aso. "I'd like to tell him what happened to us there and how we were treated by his people: the beatings, the starvation diet, the back-breaking work. Then I'd invite him to apologise."

Coombs is one of four PoWs exploited by Aso's family who spoke to The Australian. The others were either too ill to speak or didn't wish to dredge up the past.

Aso, who yesterday conducted a private visit to the Juganji temple where foreign PoWs' remains were kept, has never acknowledged his family firm's role in forced labour during the war. His father, Takakichi, ran Aso Mining during the Pacific war and Taro was its head from 1973 to 1979, before entering politics with the Liberal Democratic Party.

The Nazis enslaved millions of people, mainly East Europeans, but Germany has paid billions in compensation. No Japanese government has apologised to victims or given them a cent.

Legally, post-war treaties freed Japan from any obligation to make payments; however, these were signed before the extent of war crimes was known.

You sort of wonder if it's feasible to charge a man for his father's crimes. It's a complicated issue. Do we really want to go down that avenue of charging people with offenses for acts committed by their ancestors? There might be a fair number of chickens coming home to roost on that one, methinks.

However, there's more to the story:

Last year, in a speech at the opening of a museum in Kyushu, Aso echoed pre-war Japanese racism by describing Japan as unique in terms of culture, language, history and race.

He is also known to be associated with the extreme right-wing Nippon Kaigi (Japan Conference), which has reacted with hostility to attempts by scholars, historians and journalists to uncover details about Japan's extensive use of Chinese, Korean and Allied forced labour during the war years.

Frequent requests to the Japanese foreign ministry for comment or confirmation of facts from Aso have been met with silence. A foreign ministry spokeswoman claimed to have no knowledge of a recent article about the Aso family's connection to forced PoW labour.

Aso is related by marriage to the Japanese royal family and maintains close links with his family firm, whose president is Aso's younger brother, Yutaka. In 2001 it entered a joint venture with Lafarge Cement of France. Last December the French ambassador in Tokyo awarded Yutaka Aso the Legion d'Honneur at a champagne reception where Taro Aso was a guest of honour.

On the question of whether the latter's government post is tenable in view of his background, the German policy offers context. In a nation that has paid $US6 billion to victims of Nazi enslavement, family links alone do not disqualify citizens from public office. But they are expected to show atonement or make amends. Because of his declared views, Aso would not be admitted to any government in Berlin, a German embassy official in Tokyo says.

Aso, the grandson of a former conservative prime minister, may rise higher in Tokyo. He is one of three candidates to succeed Koizumi in September. Japanese critic Tatsuro Hanada, a Waseda University professor, says: "Aso's attitudes and behaviour are a political issue and his qualifications an important subject for the Japanese public."

I don't know if I pointed it out a while back but I always wondered about the sort of diplomatic ramifications of appointing the son of General Korechika Anami as ambassador to China of all places; but now that I find out this man is Foreign Minister, I sort of understand how that decision in personnel may have manifested. Yet what do we really know of this man?

The article is a little vague as to what excatly Aso's position is on Aso mining's role n WWII but is happy to lump him with the crime. Here's the Wikipedia entry in Japanese which makes for interesting reading.
麻生財閥の元社長(総帥)。名門一家に育ったが「首相の家庭なんて幸せなもんじゃねえ」と言う。祖父を支え忙しい父、亡くなった祖母に代わりファーストレディー役の母。曰く「両親にほったらかしにされて育った」と。小学校の運動会では友達が両親と弁当を食べるのを横目に、母に頼まれて駆けつけた料亭の女将と重箱をつついていたという。
射撃で日本を代表する選手として活躍。モントリオール五輪に日本代表選手として出場(結果は41位)。第2回メキシコ国際射撃大会(クレー・スキート(個人・団体))では優勝。
政治評論家三宅久之によると、JC会頭の改選において麻生太郎の認証無くしては 決まらないと言う。
漫画が大好きで、週刊漫画雑誌のほとんどを読み流していると豪語している。好きな作品は「ゴルゴ13」・「のだめカンタービレ」他多数。外務省の執務室まで、漫画の本を本棚一杯持ち込み、一部外務官僚から鼻白まれているようだ。
名門家系の出でありながらべらんめえ調でも知られている。本人曰く「生まれはいいが、育ちは悪い」。実際、その発言が一部で物議を醸すことも多い。英語も得意で大学卒業後、スタンフォード大学大学院に留学、卒業直前に吉田茂の働きかけで ロンドン大学大学院に無理やり転校させられ、その時スタンフォード時代に覚えたアメリカ英語をロンドンで矯正させられる。
孫の顔を見にアメリカを訪れた吉田茂だが、現れた太郎の姿に強烈なショックを受ける。完全に西海岸かぶれしていたからである。その上喋る英語は強烈なカリフォルニア訛り、いよいよ我慢ならなくなった茂は、孫をスタンフォード大学院からロンドン大学に転学させるよう和子と太賀吉を説得。仕送りを止めさせ、転学させた。
西アフリカのシエラレオネにダイヤモンド鉱山開発で2年間滞在するも内戦、革命が勃発したことから撤退したこともある。
クリスチャン(カトリック)であるが、毎年靖国神社に参拝。これは幼少の頃、祖父の吉田茂に靖国神社に連れて行かれたのが、そのまま慣習になったものである。しかし「何故戦争に負けた日に参拝しなければならないのか」と、8月15日ではなく例大祭に参拝する形を取っている。またA級戦犯が合祀されていることに対しては、疑義を唱えている。しかし分祀賛成派というわけでもない。
現在、次期自由民主党総裁候補の有力者の一人(俗にいう麻垣康三)として、名前が挙がっている。
対中などへの強硬発言や行動からタカ派と目されている。国民的人気は今一つだが、一部のブログや匿名掲示板2ちゃんねる内では高い人気を誇る。
河野グループはもともと、ハト派集団:リベラル思考の人が多く、所属派閥を間違えているのではと、皮肉る政治評論家もいる。
福岡県知事の麻生渡とは同姓であるが何の関連もない。
Some salient points.
He grew up in a very important family, but mostly under neglect. He likes talking in street dialect of Tokyo.
He likes manga comic books; so much so he's stacked a bookshelf full of the stuff in his Foreign Minstry Office. (Oh My Gawd, an Otaku!)
He is the grandson of former PM Shigeru Yoshida.
He likes the US West Coast vibe.
He competed at the 1976 Olympics in Montreal in shooting.
He's personally a Catholic (!), but visits the Yasukuni Shrine because of family custom. He does not go on 15th of August to mark the end of the war but on the Big Festival Day. He has also publicly questioned the continued internment of the A-Class War Criminals.

He simply doesn't seem to be the extremist protrayed in the article, however here's the Wikipedia English article.
Controversial statements
At a meeting of the Kono Group in 2001, Aso drew criticism when he said that "those burakumin can't become prime minister," a statement directed at Hiromu Nonaka, a burakumin member of the Diet. Aso's office attempted to clarify the statements by saying that they were misunderstood.
In May of 2003, while attending a festival at the University of Tokyo, Aso remarked that Koreans wanted to change their names to Japanese names during colonial rule, and that Japan helped in the diffusion of the Hangul writing system.
Later in 2003, when Abe was inaugurated as Minister of Internal Affairs, Posts and Communications, he predicted that information technology developments would lead to a future in which paper was replaced by "floppies."
On October 15, 2005, he praised Japan for having "one nation, one civilization, one language, one culture and one race," and stated that it was the only such country in the world. [5] [6]
On December 21, 2005, he said China was "a neighbour with one billion people equipped with nuclear bombs and has expanded its military outlays by double digits for 17 years in a row, and it is unclear as to what this is being used for. It is beginning to be a considerable threat." (See also: China's military expenditure)[7]
On January 28, 2006, he called for the emperor to visit the controversial Yasukuni shrine. He later backtracked on the comment, but stated that he hoped such a visit would be possible in the future. [8]
Kyodo News reported that he had said on February 4, 2006 "our predecessors did a good thing" regarding compulsory education implemented during Japan's colonization of Taiwan. [9]
Mainichi Daily News reports that on March 9, 2006 he referred to Taiwan as a "law-abiding country", which drew strong protest from Beijing, which considers the island a part of China. [10] His implication that Taiwan is an independent nation contradicts the agreement made between Japan and China in 1972 (the Joint Communique of the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China) that the Beijing rather than Taipei government be considered the sole legal government of China and that Taiwan be considered "an inalienable part of the territory of the People's Republic of China."
It seems the world wants to make a case out of him more than anything else.

Blog Archive