2007/11/30

My Song Of The Week

Astronaughty Returns With Coelacanth

This is the Coelacanth version of 'Astronaughty'.
We're sort of coming towards the end of the Coelacanth 2 project. Another 2-3 tracks and we'll be done. It's been pretty stressful at times, but the light at the end of the tunnel is there. And it's not an oncoming train.

2007/11/29

My Song Of The Week

Back To The Future!

Video Killed The Radio Star is my offering of the week.
I know, I know, it's a cover. Chella and I had this strange desire to do a cover of this song. What can I say?
"It is what it is".

2007/11/27

This Week's Song

It's Collaboration between Colin Moxie, a.k.a. 'Bampot' and Coelacanth.
The subject matter? Britney Spears (that other Anti-Christ).

Enjoy.

2007/11/26

Yes Paul, You May Speak Now

How Happy Is This Guy Now?

Paul Keating can't stop saying stuff. but now that the election is finally over, I think he should get the last word here after all the 'STFU' I've given him.
Saturday night's victory was not just a victory for the Labor Party; it was also a victory for those Liberals like Malcolm Fraser, Petro Georgiou and Judi Moylan, who stood against the pernicious erosion of decent standards in our public affairs.

The Liberal Party of John Howard, Philip Ruddock, Alexander Downer and Peter Costello is now a party of privilege and punishments. One that lacks that most basic of wellsprings: charity.

The French philosophers had it pretty right with the Enlightenment catchcry of liberty, fraternity and equality. There was not much liberty for the boat people, or fraternity for the Aborigines or the Muslims, or equality for the unionists who believed in nothing more revolutionary than the right to collectively bargain.
Eleven-and-a-Half Years is a lo-o-ong time. You tell them Paul, and you can come in from the cold now. :)

2007/11/25

Winners Are Grinners

The Greatness Of Pete Sampras

Believe you me, one of the greatest talents to ever walk the earth was Pete Sampras. Okay, so he never won on clay at the French, but he had everything going for him. Speed, power, accuracy, tactics, the serve and volley, the instinct, the endurance, the mental toughness. If you ever were going to create a perfect player, Pete Sampras at his prime was a good template with which to start. Of course his greatness is about to be eclipsed sometime soon by Roger Federer when he accumulates 3 more Grand Slaam titles. Federer actually is a very similar type of player who just happens to come to the net a little less. There is very little difference between the two men in terms of their command of the game.

Recently, the two men have been playing a series of exhibition matches. Naturally, Federer being the current world no.1 won the first comfortably in 2 sets, 6-4, 6-3. The Second also went to Federer 7-6, 7-6. The second result augured the Pete Sampras at 36 was finding something. In the third match, he beat Federer 7-6, 6-4.
Sampras never faced a break point and converted one of two against his opponent as he handed Federer a 7-6 (8), 6-4 defeat at the Venetian Macao arena, wrapping up a three-match Asian exhibition series between the two tennis greats.

Sampras downplayed his victory, noting Federer was coming off a long season and that he was helped by his big serve and the fast indoor carpet surface. He had only aimed to win one set during the three-match series.

"Let's not get carried away," he said at a news conference.

Sampras ruled out a comeback from retirement, telling the audience after the match, "I had my time in the 90s."

Federer tried to put on a positive spin on the loss, saying he wasn't embarrassed to lose to his idol, but still showed some disappointment.

"It's been tough beating my idol the last two times. I'm happy that he got me at least once," he said, but adding, "I hope we can do it again in the future. I'd like to get him back."

The two players have won a combined 26 Grand Slam titles, but Sampras, 36, retired five years ago after winning the U.S. Open in 2002. Twenty six-year-old Federer is fresh from another stellar season as he won three Slams and last week's Masters Cup in Shanghai in compiling a 68-9 winning record.

"I'm sort of surprised. This guy can play tennis, you know," the Swiss player said after his loss Saturday.
Play enough games between 2 great players and you would get such results, but Sampras has been retired 5 years. He obviously was short on match practice in the first game, but by the third, he must have had his form back. It doesn't prove *anything*, but it gives us a glimpse and reminder of just how good Sampras was at his prime. Nice to see you in action at the top of your game one more time, Pete.

Kevin '07
I still don't know what to make of Kevin Rudd. The man used to be a career diplomat and then somehow went political. I do note something interesting: His son-in-Law is Asian, and he speaks Mandarin. Nobody in their right mind is going to accuse this man of the kind of racism that John Howard never could shake.

The other notable thing about this victory for him is that he did it on the basis of a Presidential election. In the past, these sorts of election stratgies were an anathema, but clearly Australia has changed. It pays to be a media slut as well as a diplomat. If not but for the fact that Kevin Rudd essentially (and most diplomatically) delivered a message: "It will be just the same except it would be me running it instead of him" speaks volumes about where Australia is at. We're still about the money, the mortgages and real estate value.

Other than that, I feel we've elected some kind of Duracell Bunny over the Eveready Energiser. Something that's a little fluffier than the other sales pitch.

The End Of The Line For John Howard
As I noted a few days back, John Howard and the Coalition got spanked in the election. Jeff Kennett and his Mo-vember mustache pronounced that the "It's Time" factor had a lot to do with it. I think it was more like the, "We've had enough, now fuck off and die John" factor had a lot more to do with it.

This is a man who had to lower the nation's lowest common denominator to his level of pettiness, hatreds, intolerance, ignorance and fostered so much greed while letting people walk away from their best instincts. This is a Prime Minster who didn't mind appealing to the worst instincts in the electorate to shore up his office. This is a man who continuously ignored the most burning ethical and environmental issues of his time in the name of Conservative Politics.
If that truly were conservatism, Winston Churchill would be spinning in his grave.

My father who is an arch-conservative once said that John Howard was contrary to the expression, not a man you could be proud of under any circumstance, but a man you could be embarrassed for under any circumstance. We shall feel that embarrassment no more.

However, to give the man his due, he did deliver a great concession speech. I know I was overjoyed to know he was done and gone at that moment, but I have to concede it was the best speech I'd ever seen him deliver. He looked the most prime ministerial, majestic and equal to his office in his very last speech. It was as if he finally got to the point of gravitas and dignity on the very last moment.

John, you won't be missed. You may now fuck off and die. And even that is being too kind.

About The Angry Fat Man
Something occurred to me about the Angry Fat Man.
He's never voted in his life. I've voted every time (as is the law, but actually with great enthusiasm) ever since I've been eligible. I've participated in every democratic event that I have been able to.

He's not even an Australian citizen. In all that time, he's never done a thing. Never cast a vote. Not even for the US election. How the hell can he get worked up about all this when he's trying to establish his US citizenship, his Permanent Residency status in Australia, and then try and put himself on the dole?

2007/11/23

Yankee Hotstove

The Weirdness Continues

At the trade deadline in 2006, the Yankees traded for Bobby Abreu AND Corey Lidle, taking on their contracts from the Phillies. In exchange, they sent 2005 No.1 pick for the Yankees, C.J. Henry to th Phillies. This is what I wrote back then.
At least the Phillies are not geting Philip Hughes or Jose Tabata.
I would have thought Eric Duncan was the name that would surface in all of this but either the Phillies didn't want him or the Yankees didn't want to part with him. C.J. Henry's been dissappointing so far, but you have to figure this trade isn't too bad if you consdier that C. J. Henry only came to the Yankees because they let Jon Lieber walk to the Phillies.
I'm a little uncomfortable with this when you consider that the Yankees have already flipped another middle infield minor leaguer Hector Made for Sal Fasano only days ago.

Maybe Made was going to be another Erick Almonte, but it seems if they throw out C.J. Henry to boot, you'd have to start asking what's wrong with these MIF guys and why were they in the organisation to start with. As in, why draft C.J. Henry as a first rounder in the first place?
In other words, I wondered out aloud, what the point of signing C.J. Henry as a No.1 Pick, only to throw him out at the first trade opportunity. It turns out the Yankees really still like C.J. Henry, because now that the Phillies have released him, they've signed him to a minor league contract.
"He came to us," scouting head Damon Oppenheimer, the man who drafted the 21-year-old Henry, who batted .184 for Lakewood (Single-A) this past summer. "He told us he wanted to play for us and asked would we want him back? We made sure he wanted to play baseball and we found out the last month of the season he was fitted for contacts and hit .300."

Henry, who had a basketball offer from Kansas out of high school, was drafted as a shortstop and moved to the outfield.
"He will play the outfield in the [Single A] Florida State League," said Oppenheimer, who wasn't sure where in Tampa's outfield the speedy Henry would play.

Though Henry hasn't hit in three minor league seasons, Oppenheimer said he believes the 6-foot-3, 205-pounder will benefit from being around people he knows.
"People have a feeling for him," Oppenheimer said. "We all have a stake in this one. He means more to us than if he was with another team as a released player."
How the hell did the Phillies let him go? They must've disliked intensely what they saw in him, and were so discouraged, they didn't even bother trying to trade him.

As under-the-radar signings go, it's still very strange. Maybe C.J. Henry will turn into a useful major leaguer. It is clear that the Abreu+Lidle to Yankees trade was a total disaster for the Phillies. Lidle died in a plane crash, Bobby's option got picked up, and now C.J. Henry is back in the Yankee system. Go figure.

2007/11/22

All The Prime Minister's Men

Rat-Fucking, Ostraya-Style

One of the guys Bernstein tracks down in 'All The President's Men' is a guy who is a professional campaign hack. Stuffing ballot boxes and running innuendo are his thing. He calls it "Rat-Fucking". The obnoxious little term encapsulates the very pettiness, the mean-ness, and the rudeness of the activity. After all, how could fucking a rat even be so pleasurable or worthwhile unless one's member was suitably small?

You hear about dirty campaigns, but you don't get to see just how dirty it gets until you come face to face with rank fear-mongering and appealing to racism. Just how bad does it get?
Well, the Liberal Party have been caught out indulging in their own rat-fucking.
Bogus flyers from a fake organisation called the Islamic Australia Federation were distributed through the letterboxes of voters in a marginal seat, claiming the Labor opposition sympathised with Islamic terrorists.

The leaflets referred to the men imprisoned for the 2002 nightclub bomb attacks in Bali, which left more than 200 people dead. The flyers also claimed Labor support for the building of new mosques in the area.
Then, they tried to pretend it was a Chaser's Style Prank. Spin us another one!
Speaking on ABC radio this morning, Ms Kelly said she did not approve of the pamphlet, but labelled it a "Chaser-style of prank", a reference to ABC TV comedy team The Chaser.

"I think its intent is to be a send-up but obviously it hasn't worked," she said.

"I think if you read it you'd be laughing. Most people who have read it have said 'That's a Chaser-style of prank'."

Ms Kelly said the "prank" was "really immature stuff" that would not influence any voters.

Ms Kelly described her husband's actions as "skylarking" after a few beers.

"I'm a bit upset with him, but no, look I love him," she told Southern Cross Broadcasting.

"He hates the unions with a passion and after weeks and weeks of letterboxing, what gets to be boring material, of a repetitive message that we get them to letterbox all the time, they come up with their own skylarking over a few beers and think that something's funny," Ms Kelly said.
Skylarking after a few beers she says? Right. I see. Have a few beers, get little tipsy and one Liberal Party honcho says to another, "I know, let's go Rat-Fucking!!!!"
"Yeah. What a great idea. Luckily there's an election campaign going on."
"What'll we do?"
"We'll hand out a pamphlet saying the ALP supports Muslims and terrorism and towelheads in general."
"Yeah! Great idea. That'll teach the Sand-nigger-loving ALP!"
Is that how it goes, Mrs Kelly?

Naturally the Chaser Boys shot back:
The Chaser's executive producer Julian Morrow has now invited Ms Kelly, who will retire after the election, to join the comedy team.

"Jackie will obviously be looking for a job," Morrow said.

"One of the criticisms of The Chaser is that we don't have any women on our team.

"Bronwyn Bishop has got the inside running, but Jackie is welcome to make an application."

Morrow questioned whether the Liberal party "prank" had truly been in the spirit of The Chaser.

"If this was really a Chaser stunt, where were the big props, where was the Osama Bin Laden costume," he asked.

"The only real similarity [with a Chaser gag] is that the Liberals in Lindsay got caught and may be facing charges.

"It's a bit of a worry when the best argument you have to defend your ethical practices is that you were doing what The Chaser does.

"We are hoping this will lead to a profitable political consultancy for The Chaser in the future."
Good to see such shenanigans being brought to light. I heard reports from BD that this stuff was going on in his electorate during the 2004 elections. It's sort of funny how it comes up in this election and not the last. As fr as I can tell, rat-fucking is as old as Democracy.

Watching Lateline tonight, it was clear Attorney-General Phillip Ruddock just wanted the whole damn thing to fade away. Anthony Albanese of the ALP was pushing ahead with the allegation that the NSW Liberal Party is captive to the right faction and that this rat-fucking is widespread across many electorates. The AEC is allegedly going to look into this, but it was clear that Phillip Ruddock had no stomach to go through the ins and outs of what it might mean for Gary Clarke.

All of this reminds me of the last days of the Keating government when Ralph Willis suddenly came forth with a document that purportedly stated that the Libs would cut grants to the States. It was a set-up - a forged document leaked to Ralph Willis who bought it hook-line-and-sinker - and Ralph Willis looked mightily stupid as the curtains fell on the last ALP government.
It's nice to see a forged government finally biting the Coalition in the nuts.
As they say "he who lives by the sword..." Hang on, make that "he who fucks rats, dies by Rat STDs."

Just Sayin'

Paul Keating Won't Shut The Fuck Up
Look, I like Paul Keating. I liked him as treasurer, I liked him a PM, I liked him with his Banana Republic and Mabo and big gestures - and even that silly head-dress in New Guinea. But most of middle Australia don't. So it bothers me when on the eve of the election, he chimes in with his two cents worth.
The principal reason the public should take the opportunity to kill off the Howard Government has less to do with broken promises on interest rates or even its draconian Work Choices industrial laws, and everything to do with restoring a moral basis to our public life.

Without this, the nation has no standard to rely upon, no claim that can be believed, not even when the grave step of going to war is being considered. When truth is up for grabs, everything is up for grabs.

Cynicism and deceitfulness have been the defining characteristics of John Howard and his Government. They were even brazen enough to oversee the corruption of a United Nations welfare program. And when they were found out, not one of them accepted ministerial responsibility. Not Alexander Downer, not Mark Vaile and certainly not Howard. What they were doing was letting the cockies get their wheat sold through the AWB, while turning a blind eye to the AWB's unscrupulous behaviour - illegally funding a regime Howard was arguing was so bad it had to be changed by force.

Howard took us into the disastrous Gulf War on the back of two lies. One, that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, capable of threatening the Middle East and Western Europe; the other, that Howard was judiciously weighing whether to commit Australian forces against an evolving situation. We now know he had committed our forces to the Americans all along.

If the Prime Minister cannot be believed, who in the political system is to be believed?
Certainly not Bob Collins. There are two explicit points that need to be made.
Explicit Point No.1: Even if you're liked, an ex-prime minister who got so resoundingly voted out should shut the fuck up in this election if he wants to help Kevin Rudd.
Explicit Point No. 2: If these things are so bloody obvious to the idiot masses, how come they didn't vote him out earlier?

Now, I dislike John Howard intensely, for whole chunks of reasons ranging from the environment to welfare to education to health to taxation to economic management, even. I am actually getting excited at the thought that the reign of little dishonest Johnnie could be coming to an end within 72 hours from now. It's actually suddenly galvanising me, though I don't know why. I sure as hell don't expect Rudd to be some kind of saviour - He's Kevin Rudd for fuck's sake. :)

I think it's because I know the Angry Fat Man will take it personally. And cry. And whine and moan and bitch, blaming the 'extreme' left-bias of the media (or some-such crapola). But mostly, I can't wait to see Johnnie's sad-ass concession speech and drink a toast to that! As Arnie tells Michael Ironside in 'Total Recall' as Ironside's character Richter falls from a great height without his arms: "See you at the Pahr-ty, Richter!"

2007/11/17

Black Hole Science

Go You Aussie Scientists
This article came in from Pleiades.
The Auger Collaboration - a team of 370 scientists from 17 nations including Australia - reported overnight in the journal Science that they had pinpointed the source of 25 cosmic rays, rare particles that travel across the universe at close to the speed of light.

“They almost certainly come from 'active galactic nuclei' or the centre of very active galaxies, powered by black holes,” said Auger member Roger Clay, a high-energy astrophysicist with the University of Adelaide.

“We're now debating if they're produced near the black hole or by energy coming from the black hole.”

According to his Auger colleague Alan Watson of Britain's University of Leeds, the finding opens a “new window” on the universe and is the start of a new form of astronomy - cosmic-ray astronomy.

Along with Adelaide University colleague Bruce Dawson, Professor Watson and other overseas scientists such as University of Chicago Nobel laureate James Cronin, Professor Clay was a founding member of the collaboration.

They pulled together $US50 million to build the world's largest cosmic-ray observatory.

Named after the French physicist who first observed the cosmic rays, the Pierre Auger Observatory comprises an array of 1500 detectors, spread across 3000 sq km in Argentina.

Although many low-energy cosmic rays, like those from the Sun, hit the observatory, only high-energy cosmic rays are not deflected by magnetic fields on their journey from source to earth.

Having detected these cosmic rays, Auger scientists hope to use them to probe magnetic fields, especially those between galaxies, something now not possible.

“We're desperate to know about magnetic fields because they fill the whole of the universe and they have energy,” said Professor Clay.

Not only do magnetic fields work with gravity to shape galaxies, but they may also be one of the most important forms of energy in the universe.

“We want to know where all the energy of the universe is,” Professor Clay said. “We want to have a list of it all.”
Oi, oi, oi.
We get parochial about these things down here where we don't even have a space policy worth writing about.

2007/11/16

Yankee Hotstove

Weirder Every Day

Here's something that purports to explain the series of events from A-Rod's perspective. Interesting reading.
"He read all the criticism online from home," one person who spoke to Rodriguez said. "And when he was out of the country, he was calling people every day to find out what was being said about him. I think it got to the point where he truly was in a state of depression."

More than anything, it apparently was the very public and seemingly ironclad dismissal by Hank Steinbrenner after the opt-out that made A-Rod begin to re-think his willingness to let Boras once again dictate the direction his career would take.

"That's why he called me, to ask if Hank was serious about closing the door on him," a second person said yesterday. "From what I gathered, Boras had been telling him not to worry about what Brian Cashman was saying about the opt-out, partly because they knew they had George on their side.

"But then Alex saw the shift in power, with the Steinbrenner sons taking over, and here was Hank saying 'Goodbye, we don't want you if you don't want to be a Yankee.' Those words really messed with his mind because he really did want to be a Yankee."

Yes, there are indications that Boras had convinced Rodriguez that all of the talk about an opt-out ultimatum from Cashman was merely negotiating rhetoric, regularly reminding him George Steinbrenner was on his side.
---
People who should know say that while Rodriguez had given Boras the go-ahead to opt out, he had no idea the agent would leak the news in a way that would upstage the World Series.

"He was blind-sided by the timing," was the way one person put it. "He was (ticked) and he got more (ticked) as time went on and he saw the hit his reputation was taking. The demand for his (merchandising products) dried up almost immediately.

"He was so angry at Boras that at one point he told friends he was thinking of suing him. Then there was a series of steps that led him to take control of the situation. The Lowell talks (with the Yankees) pushed him over the edge. He didn't want any part of going to Boston. So he made his move without Boras.

"I think their relationship will survive - there's too much history there. But I don't think it will ever be the same."
So this dovetails with the Kevin Long/Brian Cashman conversation that was reported yesterday. Interesting line about the merchandising demand. When he opted out, I looked at my A-Rod signature Louisville Slugger and thought, what do I do with this now? ("try actually using it" says my partner "instead of worshiping it"). Typical A-Rod - Weird, weird, weird.

Jeter would never put me and other fans through this kind of shit. No, he puts you through this other kind of shit. :)
New York state tax officials want Jeter to fork over what could be hundreds of thousands — even millions of dollars— in back taxes and interest for the years 2001 to 2003, when the baseball shortstop claimed residency in Florida, despite his high-profile presence in New York’s sports and gossip pages during that time.

Lawyers for Jeter, who has an off-season home in Tampa, Fla., dispute the claims that Jeter “immersed himself in the New York community” and made “numerous statements professing his love for New York" during the disputed period, according to documents published this week on a state Web site monitored by FOXNews.com.
Pay your taxes properly, Jetes!

2007/11/15

Yankee Hotstove

A-Rod Watch - Never A Dull Moment

A-Rod has released a statement.
After spending time with Cynthia and my family over these last few weeks, it became clear to me that I needed to make an attempt to engage the Yankees regarding my future with the organization.
Prior to entering into serious negotiations with other clubs, I wanted the opportunity to share my thoughts directly with Yankees' ownership. We know there are other opportunities for us, but Cynthia and I have a foundation with the club that has brought us comfort, stability and happiness.

As a result, I reached out to the Yankees through mutual friends and conveyed that message. I also understand that I had to respond to certain Yankees concerns, and I was receptive and understanding of that situation.

Cynthia and I have since spoken directly with the Steinbrenner family. During these healthy discussions, both sides were able to share honest feelings and hopes with one another, and we expect to continue this dialogue with the Yankees over the next few days.
This is a really interesting development.
Earlier, there was this piece in the tabloids.
A high-ranking Yankees source told the Daily News that the team is willing to bring Rodriguez back on a below-market contract, one that would make up for the $21 million subsidy from the Rangers that the Yanks lost when A-Rod opted out of the final three years of his contract.
In addition, the Yankees don't want to deal with Boras, who has been Rodriguez's agent since the slugger was 16 years old.
"We will not negotiate with Scott Boras," a Yankees source said. "He cannot be in the room."
The Yankees are also aware that Boras could convince Rodriguez to stop the talks. "We realize it could be a trap to get us back in the negotiations," said one Yankee official. "But we don't think that's the case."
Rodriguez apparently approached the Yankees through a third-party intermediary. "He went to them," said the source.
As the Daily News reported today, A-Rod will have to have person-to-person talks with the Steinbrenner brothers -- Hank and Hal -- before a deal can be sealed.
According to the first source, the Yankees are waiting for Mariano Rivera to sign a new contract before finalizing any plans with Rodriguez, who is expected to take a 10-year deal worth roughly $275 million. That would be about $75 million less than Boras has been looking for, though most industry insiders believe there was never going to be a $350 million offer out there for Rodriguez.

"Alex is going to be back with the Yankees," the source said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the deal had not been made public. "The Yankees don't have a choice. How are they going to compete without Alex? They need him back."
So the trial separation ends up in more excess? Absence makes he heart fonder? Funny that.
If A-Rod gets his 10 year $275m he's still going to be the highest paid player by far.

UPDATE: Riddle Me This, Cashman
Get this:

The Yankees, however, have known for a while that A-Rod still hoped to be in pinstripes. Hitting coach Kevin Long, who is tight with Rodriguez, said Wednesday night that he told general manager Brian Cashman during his own contract negotiations two weeks ago that Rodriguez wanted to return.Here's how the conversation went, according to Long:

Cashman: "Kev, we made our offer and they shut us down."

Long: "I still think Alex would love to be a Yankee."

Cashman: "I don't get it."

Long: "Well, I just know how much he wants to be a Yankee and I know how much that you have expressed that you want him back. If that's the case, then certainly you should both still be talking about it."

Cashman didn't return a message Wednesday.

I don't get it either, Brian. Why would A-Rod opt out before hearing what the Yankees had to say, if he really wanted to stay a Yankee?

2007/11/13

Yankees Hotstove Update

Posada Is Back

As you would expect, Jorge Posada signed with the Yankees for 4 years $52.1m.
Jorge Posada, the 36-year-old free agent catcher, will remain a Yankee, sources familiar with the negotiations told the Daily News Monday night.
After being schmoozed by Mets general manager Omar Minaya Monday afternoon during a lengthy lunch at Le Cirque, Posada and his agents finally received the offer from the Yankees they had been hoping for all along.
The Yankees offered Posada a four-year, $52 million contract - the same deal they gave both Johnny Damon and Hideki Matsui two years ago - to remain in pinstripes. The deal will become official pending a physicial and final contract language being ironed out.
This is excellent news as he is still one of the best hitting catchers in the game.
He's one of my fave Yankees. it will be good for him to see out his career in pinstripes.

Pavano Is Out

Carl Pavano is about to get the boot off the 40-man roster. In case you forgot, this is the guy the Yanks signed, along with Jaret Wright tat brought about the fateful 2005 season - yeah, you remember, the one with Aaron Small and Shawn Chacon bailing out the crapped-out rotation...
Pavano had Tommy John surgery in the first week of July. A quick healer might make it back to the mound in a year. But Pavano is not a quick healer. There probably is a slim chance that since they have invested so much in the right-hander that the Yanks will keep him on the roster, hope he recuperates and then try to trade him late in the season. Nevertheless, as one AL executive said, "Who would trade for a guy like that who basically hasn't pitched in three years?"

In addition, the Yanks would have to eat just about Pavano's entire salary anyway, even if there were a trade to be made. Pavano is due $11 million in 2008 and has a 2009 team option for $13 million with a $1.95 million buyout. The Yanks likely will see it as a sunk cost and value protecting their prospects over some pipedream of getting any value out of the indifferent Pavano. The Yanks already have a complicated 40-man roster situation because to sign Juan Miranda and Andrew Brackman, they had to give them major league contracts and, thus, 40-man-roster slots years before they would have been eligible for them.

If Pavano is not released this month, he probably will be before spring training as the Yanks' 40-man roster refills with either their own signed free agents such as Jorge Posada, Mariano Rivera and Andy Pettitte, or their replacements.
So for a four-year, $39.95 million contract, the Yanks would have received 19 starts and a load of headaches and heartaches from the brittle Pavano. He went 5-6 as a Yankee with a 4.77 ERA. He had as many wins in four years as a Yankee as reliever Luis Vizcaino did in the four weeks from to June 22-July 21 last year.
Why indeed!.
He's been on the 60-Day DL, but the 60-Day DL is gone during the off-season, so in order for the Yankees to protect the prospects, rather than collect 90% of the 13million owed to him from insurance, Pavano will be non-tendered. Awesome!

Mike Lowell Is Available
A few months back, I covered why it was bad to move Mike Lowell back in '98. 10 years later, he's available. Well, he was available two years ago for a price, but of course the Yankees had a third-baseman then...

Here's Pete Abraham:
The Globe says there is no deal for Mike Lowell with Boston. Not yet anyway. He wants four years.
Now he’s on the market and a certain team in the Boogie Down needs a third baseman. But the Yankees should be careful of Lowell.
Home in 2007: .373/.418/.575
Away in 2007: .276/.339/.428
Career at Yankee Stadium: .278/.330/.456 (90 ABs)
This is guy is one of the finest people in all of baseball. I’ve known him for 11 years and he’s a great guy. But this is also a guy who went .236/.298/.360 for Florida in 2005. Playing at Fenway Park in that lineup revitalized him.
The Yankees need a third baseman and taking him would weaken Boston. But a four-year deal for him would be a reach.
Yeah. Tough choice. Will Lowell fall off the face of the Earth or will he retain his value? Reasonably speaking, he's at the point you'd only want to give 3 years and no more. He wants four. Four years means he would be at best a DH or bench guy at the end, probably blocking the next 3B coming through the system.
Pass.

Blade Runner - The Final Cut

Abandoning The Practice

The normal format for my reviews are 'What's Good', 'What's Bad', and 'What's Interesting'. I'm chucking it out for this film. This is because this film is by far the most important film in my youth, if not my life. I love it to death, I will love it unto death and like a long lost lover, I can claim it ruined my life. :)

Certainly, from the moment I saw the stlll above, before the film even came out, I knew this film was it. This film was for me.

A Long Time Coming

Way back when in the early 1990s when the 10th year 'Director's Cut' came out, I wrote a review for the Nub's Rejectamenta calling for Ridley Scott to go back to the cutting room once more to finish a job half-done. At the time it felt ludicrous to even suggest it, given that the director himself had said the 1992 version was his cut. Of course projects of any kind being what they are, they are never finished - clearly he felt he had to go back to it, which does not surprise us at all.
And so Ridley Scott presents us with his Final Cut this time.

'Blade Runner' is a funny film in time as it became a phenomenon all of its own. Its fans are so loyal that basically kept allowing the marketing machine to come back and re-Present the picture over and over again. I think I once shot a scene for an educational show on marketing where I brought in all my Blade Runner paraphernalia. This included the reprinted book, poster, The mocked up LP sound track, the CD of the sound track, the proper Vangelis soundtrack on CD, the VHS with the original film and a DVD of the Director's Cut. Needless to say I will fork out the cash for 'The Final Cut'. In a sense the die-hard fans allowed Ridley Scott to repeatedly re-visit his film, honing, it, making it better at each pass. The fact of the matter is, this version was 25 years in the making, and it took a lot of audience support.

As I explained to my friends Walk-Off HBP and Gra-Gra, I always felt it was the one film I had emotional ownership thereof. Yet as the years go by, I feel like it has owned me. Walk-Off HBP thinks the film is so important to Gen-X it is impossible to explain the phenomenon without taking it into account. And yet, the film clearly has a wide appeal. During the screening I sat next to an elderly lady who was guffawing at all the right bits and really taking in the movie. As incongruous as it seemed, she was really in to it. Then there were kids who were clearly born after 1982. Heck, some looked like they were born after the 1991 Director's Cut. And they all looked like devout fans.

Technical Merits


'Blade Runner' has always been a watershed film. It essentially fuelled the VHS sales boom of the mid1980s; it was the first film to be re-released with a 'Director's Cut due to its strong following; it was the flagship Warner Brothers release when DVDs first hi the market; and now we're seeing the 4K projection system in a theatre for its 'Final Cut release. Quite an achievement for a film that barely ran 6weeks at Village in George Street when it was first released in 1982.

The Sony 4k projection system was astounding. I have seen this film so often with scratches and missing frames I'm used to seeing it through a green-scratch glaze. When the DVD came out I was delighted to see the thing without scratches, but then it was beset by the compression artefacts instead and I was never a great fan of the Director's Cut. I think I've watched my DVD through thrice at the most.

By contrast, the 4k projection was pristine as any film could ever be projected as well as being absolutely free of blemishes. It was a surreal experience in of itself to be able to discern so much detail in the dark shadows that were obscured in other versions, both film and video. It's a blast to see such a perfect representation of any film. This 4k system will signal the death-knell of projected films. There may never be a technical specification reason to print another projection print - from now on, people will do so "for the look" i.e. artistic reasons. Print is dead, and last night's screening of 'Blade Runner' was there to announce it - It's that good.

Whither Now Empathy? - Digging The Pet Artificial Snake

In the original novel, Voight Kampf test was used to test Empathy. As in, the androids were incapable of empathy and therefore susceptible to being found out. Androids couldn't care abut anything - except Dick was able to delineate a distinction for that lack of care. The Voight-Kampf test machine was Philip K. Dick's way of saying there were psychopaths in our midsts, but science could diagnose them. A very 1960's take on psychopathy. Of course at the end of the book, we get to the point where Rick Deckard faces off against Roy Batey/Batty and simply guns him down.

An interesting aspect of the book is that because people needed to show they had empathy, they got pets. So pets signified empathy - but what it signified was meant to be our humanity. Of course, humans being perverse, we see in both the book and film that the more elaborate the pets, the more display value they had - hence the pet ostriches in the film and the Q&A between Deckard and Rachel
"Do you like our owl?"
"Is it artificial?"
"Of course."
The assumption of fake-ness is what makes it brilliant.
Humanity's attachment to animals both real and electric represents our dying grasp at coming to terms with Gaia, even though our rampant commercialism is tearing apart the Earth. If you had the power to create an artificial owl so well, why didn't you just preserve the owl's habitat? The rhetoric is pointed, but we can see in the world that people just don't understand that sort of abstraction.

Lately because of my new parrot, I've been forced to ponder this point. Because there are only a few thousand of barrabands left, my caged bird represents an important part of the diminishing barraband genome. I'm seriously worried for his brethren now, and by extension, the Earth. By keeping him and caring for him, I have inadvertently stepped into the world of 'Blade Runner'. I'm amazed at Philip K. Dick's insight.

'Blade Runner' As Fetish Object

One of the things that popped into my head as I watched this film for the thirty-something-th time in parts and first time in others, it occurred to me that one of the subtexts of the film is about fetishism. Nary has there been a film that lavishly brings to light the texture of objects. And the objects are so manifestly inviting to the touch; or we recoil at the quality of objects. The entire film is loaded and layered with *things* - books, leather, plastic, steel, textured concrete blocks on the wall, hair, skin tones, make-up, glass, sequins, scales on the fingertip, haze in the air.

The overwhelming sensory overload of the film actually is brought even more into focus (so to speak) with the 4k projection. The film which is about the objectification of everything presents itself as one big object. Now, I've bought this film over and over and over again, so I can lay claim to the truth that this film is an objectification in of itself. But it's not just that alone. The film actually presents a kind of materialism that enables us to understand our own consumer instincts. We yearn for the beauty of nature so much, we devise the means to replicate and re-create. This re-creation of nature with its fake owls and replicants becomes recreational; and this very Recreation - and therefore our instinct for beauty and pleasure - in turn becomes the adventure and misadventure when what we create turns on us in a classic Frankenstein twist.

It's still wonderfully relevant and thought-provoking, which was the greatest thing to walk away with at the end of the night.

The News That's Fit To Abuse

Paul Keating Writes Again

Yeah, you know I miss the old ALP Warhorse. Here's his latest serving in the Herald.

Work Choices happened only because the unexpected control of the Senate gave Howard his lifetime chance to break the back of trade unions. The same trade unions which, by 2005, had given him nine years of moderate wage outcomes consistent with an inflation rate of 2.5 per cent.

But not good enough for him. He attacked anything that was decent around him to push down further the interests of lower-paid people. As if the profit share in the economy, and the sharemarket with it, wasn't high enough, going from one record to another.

And to oversee his wilful system, he put in Kevin Andrews and Joe Hockey, both in political short pants when I had comprehensively deregulated the system in 1993. Hockey was not even in the Parliament. I could name a thousand people who have forgotten more about the wages system than either of them knows.

But now all of us have to put up with Hockey's infantile claims, while that refugee from the Dollar Sweets case, Costello, looks forward as prime minister to putting the boot into working people even further.

This is the reality of the industrial relations system in Australia today.

Only 5 per cent of employees are covered by the Goebbelsian-titled Work Choices legislation. The other 95 per cent live every day of their working lives under the Keating Labor government's industrial laws.

Howard's and Costello's vicious assault on Kevin Rudd's and Julia Gillard's industrial relations proposals, claiming that they will see a return to centralised wage fixing, is based on nothing more than a lie. What Rudd and Gillard are proposing is the maintenance of the existing enterprise bargaining-cum-safety net model set up by Labor in 1993, with modifications to take account of the continuing and evolving needs of the economy and its workplaces.

You get the gist.
That's our old Paul letting it rip. I worry about him coming out of the woodwork now, but I guess he's feeling confident about the polls.

Socrates Said They Hang You For Irony - Part 6 Where Joe Gets The Shits

Joe Hockey is spewing chips.

Workplace Relations Minister Joe Hockey says he's upset about the attention given to a joke he made about his wife's pregnancy.

Mr Hockey was last night named as a contender at the annual Ernie awards for sexist remarks.

"Well, it's exhausting for me, her being pregnant," Mr Hockey told the Seven Network earlier this year.

"I don't know why, during the birth process, they only focus on the women."

Mr Hockey said today he had been targeted by 'deceitful, left-wing groups'.

"You know why I'm upset about that?" Mr Hockey told Southern Cross Broadcasting today.

"Because I said that on (the Seven Network's) Sunrise with absolute irony.

"We were talking about - are you going to be at the birth of your second child - and I was joking.

"We were all laughing, including Kevin Rudd, we were all laughing about it and I said, 'oh yeah I don't know why, you know, it's going to be tormenting for me, torturous for me to be at the birth'.

"And we were joking about it.

"This deceitful, left-wing, bloody feminist groups have completely taken it out of context and tried to make me out to be a misogynist pig, and I really hate that sort of thing."

You reap what you sow, Joe; and what Socrates said is indeed true.
He took his hemlock, you can take your Ernie nomination on the chin. ...but it is a little rough. :)

2007/11/12

Skewiff

What I'm Working On
Has to be said, I'm a busy guy lately. I'm trying to do a whole bunch of stuff and get some projects in order so I'm going to be even more vacant from these pages, which is bad.
I'm also getting less time for music and film-projects so this blog is going to get a little quieter in the coming months. Seeing that it's the MLB off-season, I probably should be able to devote more energy to my own thing rather than stressing about the Yankee Win-Loss record. You know how it is, if you've read any of this blog.

I'm working on a screenplay called 'Crashing by Design' with Kendal, who I worked with on 'Key Psycho' and 'Touch'. So far we've been a pretty good writing team, so we'll see how we develop this project. It's coming along nicely as we've come to finish our 30page treatment. I now have to adapt the format of this thing into a fully-fledge screenplay which ought to take me a week or so, but we're also hoping to get some cash out of some funding bodies. Ain't that the way?

Politics
Some people wrote to remind me that Democracy isn't a benefit that is available to all on this planet. Yes, that is true. However it is also true that rarely has the history of Democracy on this planet seen such an uninspiring contest as the one we are seeing between John Howard and Kevin Rudd. The high point of the coming election may well be when Maxine McKew ousts John Howard from his seat, which would be very nice. Apparently there are quite a number of Chinese people in that electorate now. I wonder if they know about John Howard's "too many Asians" comment back from 1987.

Sport

The Test Cricket season has started and the Australians got off to a flying start stomping all over a divided Sri Lankan team, for the first couple of days only to encounter some resistance. Finally given his moment, Stuart McGill delivered.
"A milestone like 200 [wickets] is the pinnacle of my career so far, and I'm starting to become a member of a smaller and smaller club," MacGill said. "Things like that are nice for your kids and family. There's not going to be anybody else in my kid's class with a dad with 200 Test wickets. I hope. Because otherwise I'm going to have to find something else that's cool. I'm pleased I've given them something to be proud of."

Not since Clarrie Grimmett 82 years ago has a spinner taken 200 wickets in fewer matches. Indeed, only two other bowlers of any persuasion have bettered MacGill's effort of 41 Tests to reach the 200-mark - Dennis Lillee and Waqar Younis - and none had to contend with the kind of staccato career the veteran leg spinner has endured since making his debut against a South African team that featured the likes of Hansie Cronje, Pat Symcox and Gary Kirsten. Australia have contested 110 Tests since then, and for 69 of those MacGill has been confined to the sidelines.

For a bowler who has scraped and clawed for every opportunity at Test level, it seemed somehow fitting that MacGill would be forced to toil for his 200th yesterday. A determined opponent, a placid pitch, a slippery ball, and a dicky knee were all conspiring against the 36-year-old, and though economical in his earlier spells, MacGill was somewhere short of penetrative.
Goodness! He's 36 now? I'm deeply shocked.
Last year, I was glued to the set. This year, I'm mercifully drawn away by work.

Our City Is An Urban Dung-Heap

Sydney just isn't what it used to be. If you thought I was the only one, here's an article. Amazingly, I found this sentence:
The City of Sydney lacked a permanent town planner for years, to little outcry.
The rest is history, as they say.

2007/11/08

New Images Of The Moon

JAXA And NHK

1920 x1080 pixels.
This stuff was shot by a camera developed by NHK, on a Lunar satellite launched by JAXA.
Click to enlarge.

Also, check out this video link here:

2007/11/07

The Election - The Race So far

Oh Cripes, Not Another One!
It's election time in Australia. The gong has been sounded a few weeks ago and I failed to blog it because well, it just wasn't exciting this time through. I used to like these things, but a contest between John Howard and Kevin Rudd is actually like watching a sport between a team of slugs and worms. Or a World Series featuring the Red Sox.

Somebody e-mailed me today and said, "enough with this A-Rod. Write us something with more immediate Australian concerns. And hated your cover of 'Silly Love songs' too"
Crikey.
In other words, face up to a bit of reality that's going around you. All right-y then.

First off, you all know I think John Howard is a Runt-with-a-C.
What you don't know is that I actually think Kevin Rudd wants to be the same kind of Runt; and this gives me no optimism whatsoever. Since the last election the Labor Party has taken a me-too line on things, if not for the difference of talking about the Climate, Education and Health.

The problem there of course is that most hospitals are run by the State Governments and they're all ALP governments at the moment, which goes to show the ALP have no credibility when they talk about Health. Then there's the increasingly lowering educational standards in the State System, and so the ALP has a substantial credibility gap there. So the only thing that you can say with any confidence about a Rudd government is that they would sign The Kyoto Protocol (oi!) and that has got to be something.

Look, I actually voted for Mark Latham last time. I wanted to dislodge The Runt-with-a-C so badly, I voted for a guy who at best represented a generational warrior as well as a class warrior. I'm not ashamed of that - Paul Keating would'a been proud. Except the rest of stupid Australia voted back in the Runt, and now is willing to vote in the guy who is the younger ALP-branded version of the Runt-with-a-C.
I dunno. I'm just not encouraged by any of this.

There's no vision. But then that's not new. Australians hate the arts and sciences; they hate the big picture; they would sooner sell their own children if they could get 0.5% off the interest rate and value their houses more than just about anything. You can't be too surprised that they keep voting for the sorts of bums and conks you wouldn't leave with your mother... And then they turn out to be Bob Collins. Go figure.

Why Are We So Fucked Then?
Money. It's got to be the money. You go to certain parts of the world and it's clear they're not as wealthy as us, but they have proper civic pride. We used to be like that even 7-8 years ago. notions of Social Justice didn't get sneered at as being 'Bolshy' they got institutionalised in things like 'Equal Opportunity'. Now, we've had a decade of a government that has essentially turned us into people who care about the money first.

Think for a moment if you know of a starving artist. (not me!)
Now think of what most of your other friends say about the starving artist being a starving artist. Are any of those remarks that come to mind positive?
Didn't think so.
And the reason is, there's a continuous contempt for people without money in this country. And I can remember when it wasn't like this at all.

So this country has gone from happy-go-lucky to bourgeoisie-snobbery in a mere decade, all on the back of the property bubble and the rush to take out mortgages. Not only did the people of this country sell out their good sense for money, they sold out for nickels and dimes. The problem with saying you get the government you deserve is that very government then defines your subsequent choices, and the choices keep getting poorer because we as people are becoming poorer in our beings, while we become materially wealthier. It's tragic.

2007/11/06

More Fun With The Lineup Toy

Having Fun yet?

I've been playing around with the lineup toy some more trying some weird lineups.

All Japan:
A. Iwamura
Ichiro
K. Fukudome
H. Matsui
K. Johjima
R. Petagine
T. Iguchi
K. Matsui
N. Nakamura
Amazingly, this squad is worth 5.8.

Bill James Youth All Stars:
G. Sizemore
H. Ramirez
D. Wright
P. Fielder
C. Granderson
N. Markakis
J. Francoeur
B.J. Upton
J, Reyes
This squad is also worth 6.5 - about as good as the Yankees if they can retain Posada, and get somebody decent in 3B.

Slugging Nine:
B. Bonds
L. Berkman
D. Ortiz
R. Howard
A. Rodriguez
M. Holliday
P. Fielder
A. Dunn
C. Pena

This lineup is worth 8.6 runs. That's nine guys who are close to being worth a run a game per 27 outs.

The Alex's (A lineup made up entirely of guys called Alex):
A. Escobar
A. Gordon
A. Rodriguez
A. Rios
A. Gonzales
A. Sanchez
A. Cintron
A. Romero
A. Cora
This squad is worth 5.3 runs. If you take A-Rod out and put in Alex Prieto instead, the number drops to 4.8. So A-Rod really is worth just over a run per 27 outs, all on his own.

Top Free Agents available this year:
J. Posada
B. Bonds
A. Rodriguez
K. Fukudome
A. Jones
M. Lowell
T. Hunter
A. Rowand
J. Guillen
This team comes to 6.8. however, if you dropped out A-Rod and Barry, you get David Eckstein and Milton Bradley as the next best and that drops the score to 6.2.

2007/11/03

What Boras Wanted For A-Rod

$350 Million Over 11 Years

You have to admire the chutzpah of a guy who brazenly asks for this much money for a 32 year old player. Yeah, he's historically great with a good chance of retaining most of his value, but that sum is insane.
Before Alex Rodriguez opted out of his contract with the Yankees earlier this week, the team was told that it would not be able to meet with the third baseman unless it presented an offer of at least $350 million, sources say.

The Yankees had hoped to meet with Rodriguez this week, and would have presented him with an extension offer close to five years and $150 million, to begin at the conclusion of his 2008-2010 contract, through which he would have earned $81 million. Through the Yankees' proposal, then, Rodriguez would have made about $230 million over eight years, and during the last five years of the contract, sources say, he would have earned the highest annual salary in Major League Baseball history.

But team executives were told, sources say, that in order to arrange a meeting with Rodriguez, they would have to be prepared to make an extension offer that would take the third baseman's deal up to a total value of $350 million. That means that the offer the Yankees intended to propose would have been more than $100 million short.
This A-Rod thing is already getting pretty stinky, like a fish corpse in the sun.
Well here it goes, I've been resisting the sour grapes for days, but I can't resist their allure:
I liked having him on the team but you know, the Yankees never even got to the World Series with this guy. So maybe it really is a blessing in disguise that A-Rod and his grandiose self-image marches right out of the clubhouse into a greenback sunset somewhere else where he can pad his numbers and gild his legacy with gold. There's something of a King Midas in A-Rod, including the tragic bit where he turns his daughter in to a lump of gold.

SORT OF AN UPDATE: Peter Abraham writes the amazing LoHud Yankees blog which is written from the perspective of a beat writer covering the Yankees. He had this insight:

Some people want to believe Boras has some sort of hypnotic hold on his clients and the poor player is a somehow a pawn. But these are adults. If A-Rod is capable of living to the age of 32, getting married and having a child, he is capable of telling his agent what he wants.

In the two seasons I have been around the Yankees, only one player has talked about his salary time after time after time. About how being the highest paid player in “pretty cool”, about the pressure of being the highest paid player and about the responsibility of being the highest paid player.

One guess who that is.

Scott Boras wasn’t above him manipulating any strings. If you want to be angry about Alex Rodriguez turning his back on the Yankees, be angry at Alex Rodriguez.
Blame Boras? That’s just what they want you to do.
That, tells me far more than I ever needed to know. A-Rod would be a shit of a guy to share a dugout with if everything he does or says is couched by him talking about his salary and then cries uncle when beat writers roast him for not living up to his own billing.

Incidentally, I've been playing with the RLYW's Lineup Toy for projected 2008 lineups.
When one fixes the other parts of the lineup as:

Bobby Abreu
Derek Jeter
Jason Giambi
Jorge Posada
Hideki Matsui
Robinson Cano
Melky Cabrera
Johnny Damon

...and substitute various 3B men, the RC/27 is invariably in the 6.5 range.
Indeed, I've shoved names like Eric Chazez, Hank Blalock, Morgan Ensberg, Wilson Betemit, Alex Gordon (not that he's available) Andre Ethier, Nomar Garciaparra, Eric Hinske, (please no!) and the number stays pretty much at 6.5. In fact, I've substituted in Eric Duncan, Norihiro Nakamura (for kicks) and even Drew Henson (LOL!) only to find it only drops to 6.2. At 6.2 runs per game, that's well over 1000 runs in a 162 game season. Of the available 3B men, with A-Rod alone, the number spikes to 6.8; although David Wright would make it 6.7.

So if the Yankees can re-sign Jorge Posada, and expect the vets to lose 5-10% of their effectiveness to age, regression to the mean, reduced playing time and all that, the offense is still going to be pretty formidable without A-Rod.
Also, if Wilson Betemit plus platoon partner is going to be as effective as any choice at 3B, then it behooves the Yankees not to get another solid bench guy.

2007/11/01

Hot Stove Season Is Underway

Joe Girardi Replaces Joe Torre

This is sort of 'the sane choice'. Choose the guy who played in the organization in a World Series winning team, who has managed and won a manager of the year award, who is an ex-catcher who understands the nuances of things, who has an engineering degree so is not a complete stranger to say, basic statistics which is what is used in sabermetric analysis.
Good choice, says Rob Neyer.
Keith Law essentially agrees.

Boras Spins It
...more like 'Nanook Rubs It'. As in rubbing the doggie doo into the eyes of the Yankee brass. Mar-jur-ine!!
Super Agent to A-Rod Scott Boras is spinning some lines (on whatever it is that they spin lines upon up there) essentially saying that the door remains open for the Yankees to negotiate with A-Rod as a FA. He says he doesn't understand why the Yankees don't view A-Rod the same way as they view Posada, Rivera and Pettitte.

The Yankees were willing to offer around $240million for 8 years. It's overpaying by a significant bit. But worse still, the Yankees are going to pay a luxury tax on any an every dollar they spend on A-Rod. So an 8year $240million contract is actually going to be more like $300million to the Yankees whereas another club below the threshold could sign A-Rod for the same money and not pat extra. This is why the Texas Rangers subsidy was crucial in the discussions, and why the Yankees would have their feathers ruffled by A-Rod opting out without giving them an opportunity to at least make an offer.

Boras on the other hand thinks that Free Agency is the best thing a player can have; so A-Rod going to the well again to see if there's any more money in the well, makes total sense if you understand Boras' logic. However, he can't really be serious when the Yankee brass bristle and he innocently says, "but you should talk to him now that he's a Free Agent." Why would the Yankees enjoy paying more to purchase the same thing and take that as good faith negotiation?

The Yankees will offer arbitration to A-Rod, because they definitely want the compensation top-half first round draft next year. maybe they'll find another Jeter there.
There is of course the remote (as in really remote) possibility that there isn't a larger deal waiting out there for A-Rod in which case he may take the arbitration and stay in pinstripes. Boras has pulled this stunt before. To be honest, I wouldn't really want to see this scenario take place - because I'm over A-Rod opting out already - but it's now on the cards.

Meanwhile Rivera Does Talk
Mo and his agent Fernando Cuza on the other hand have spoken to the Yankees.
New manager Joe Girardi is believed to have taken part in the meeting, which took place at Legends Field - not long after Girardi formally agreed to his own three-year contract.

Brian Cashman flew in from New York for the meeting with Rivera and his agent.

Rivera's presence is certainly a positive, especially considering he emphatically stated in spring training that he planned to enter the free-agent market and view the Yankees as just another team.

But that's obviously not the case right now, as Rivera and the Yankees are taking advantage of their 15-day exclusive negotiating window. Other teams can start to negotiate beginning Nov. 12.

Asked if he was optimistic that a deal could be reached by that date, Cuza said: "It really depends on them, and that's a question I can't answer. We just wanted to see what each side had to say."
There you go.

Blog Archive