2006/09/20

Gore Delivers Speech

Better As An Advocate Activist?


Al Gore was here in Australia recently, and now he has delivered an important proposal back in the USA.
NEW YORK, Sept. 18 -- Former vice president Al Gore laid out his prescription for an ailing and overheated planet Monday, urging a series of steps from freezing carbon dioxide emissions to revamping the auto industry, factories and farms.

Gore proposed a Carbon Neutral Mortgage Association ("Connie Mae," to echo the familiar Fannie Mae) devoted to helping homeowners retrofit and build energy-efficient homes. He urged creation of an "electranet," which would let homeowners and business owners buy and sell surplus electricity.

"This is not a political issue. This is a moral issue -- it affects the survival of human civilization," Gore said in an hour-long speech at the New York University School of Law. "Put simply, it is wrong to destroy the habitability of our planet and ruin the prospects of every generation that follows ours."

Gore was one of the first U.S. politicians to raise an alarm about the dangers of global warming. He produced a critically well-received documentary movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," that chronicles his warnings that Earth is hurtling toward a vastly warmer future. Gore's speech was in part an effort to move beyond jeremiads and put the emphasis on remedies.

He took a veiled shot at the Bush administration: "The debate over solutions has been slow to begin in earnest . . . because some of our leaders still find it more convenient to deny the reality of the crisis." But he saluted a Republican, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, for helping to push through sharp reductions in carbon emissions.

Gore noted that few politicians of any party are willing to step into the "no politician zone" of tough steps needed to address global warming.

Gore cautioned against looking for a "silver bullet" policy reform that would address global warming, a view many scientists share.

"There are things that you can do today and in the midterm, and things to tend to in the long term," said Gavin A. Schmidt, a climate scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. "You have to think on all the scales at once, and even that will only help you avoid the worst scenarios."

---
Gore touched on nuclear power as a palliative for global warming but made it clear that this is at best a partial solution. Nuclear power inevitably raises questions of nuclear arms proliferation, he said.

And he warned against thinking that the recent drop in oil prices offers much help: "Our current ridiculous dependence on oil endangers not only our national security, but also our economic security."
It seeems he's doing a good job persuading people of the seriousness of the issue. I think it's great that he can just air the issue out because he'ss not looking for votes, he's looking to change the cultural landscape in Washington DC surrounding carbon emissions. Kind of goes to show that you need not be the President of the USA to change the world.

8 comments:

Avon Brandt said...

If Al can translate support for his stance on global warming into votes, then I think he could be an effective advocate *and* activist. He must still have strong support since he was robbed of the presidency. The questions are - does he *want* to be back in the presidential race, and would he get the votes? One of the nasty issues that potential leaders face in the USA & UK is voluntary voting. There's so many people in both places who'll bitch about the quality of the leadership even if they don't vote at all. I don't get that.

Knowledge is Power said...

Well done Richard Branson !!!

I like the man !!!

Knowledge is Power said...

Richard Branson on Thursday pledged to invest about $3 billion over the next decade to combat global warming and promote alternative energy, saying that it was critical to protect the environment for future generations.

Branson, said the money would come from 100 percent of the profits generated by his transportation sectors – trains and airline companies.

jeronimus said...

If Gore wants to try for the WhiteHouse again with Global W
as part of his platform, fine.
But I don't think it helps the cause of removing climate change scepticism, when a polly, or ex polly, sets himself up as a spokesman for it.
It politicises the issue, no matter how much Gore denies he
is going to run for the Presidency. Scientists,
who have been trying to convince the conservatives for years, will
find their job a lot harder thanks to Gore. The guy is a jerk.

Art Neuro said...

The guy might be a jerk, or worse, a politiican, but his message is right. So I place more weight on that.

If he runs for President again, and implements good policy that's not the worst thing.
If nobody listens to him *because* he was a pollie, that would be much worse.

jeronimus said...

You weigh his message
fairly because you are already a convert. You are not the problem.
I would be happy if he ran and WON
and implemented the cause but he aint gonna. I guess it's better that Gore is open about his beliefs
than if he secretly orchestrated
a campaign through proxies claiming
to be completely apolitical.

Art Neuro said...

Err.... A 'convert' to what, exactly?

If you mean that I've been persuaded by the scientific merits of the arguments to do with Global Warming that have also been observed, proven and peer-reviewed, then yes.
In as much as I believe in science, sure.

I sure didn't take Mr. Gore's cue to arrive at my position.

I'm more interested in why you see Mr. Gore in such a negative light.

jeronimus said...

Hi Art
Didn't mean 'convert'
in any perjorative sense
or to imply that Gore
has enlightened you.
It's just that I can sympathise with the
scientists who now have a much
harder battle trying to convince
the Republicans (who happen to be in power)because G W
is now associated in their
minds with the political
opposition. Gore should
let scientists do the convincing,
rather than bandwagonning.

Blog Archive