2004/07/16

The Annual Art Neuro Critical Challenge 2004
I received these interesting pictures from a regualr reader. At least I hope he's reading regularly. :) Anyway, he feels they are bordering on kitcsch, but I think they are  highly ironic  works of art.
Discuss!

- Art Neuro

1 comment:

DaoDDBall said...

They are beautiful girls. They are posed. They are typical of the models/artworks sported in Asian Magazines of girls or for girls. They are clothed.

The big difference between these shots and parno shots is the clothing. These shots could precede a porno shoot. The object of the shot is the same.

In many ways, these shots are similar in nature to the nude young girl shots of Lewis Carrol fame. I don't believe that Lewis Carrol's work was pornographic, but I believe that Hugh Heffner's work is. I don't argue artistic intent, although I think motive plays a part. Pornography is the image of lust for sale. Art is the preservation and encapsulation of concept.

In fact, these 'girls' could be any age from 12 to early 20's. Some look like some year 99's from any high school in the Cabramatta area.

Blog Archive