Showing posts with label Quadrophenia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quadrophenia. Show all posts

2012/01/08

'Brighton Rock'

Running Up In Front Of The Hundred Faces

I laughed so much I thought maybe I've become psychopathic. This is a great tribute film masquerading as a Grahame Greene adaptation. I knew the film was set in 1964 as opposed to its original period, and people have been wondering why it had to be, just to accommodate the youth riots. The quick and dirty answer is that this film has less to do with recreating Grahame Greene's novel so much as retracing 'Quadrophenia'. It's blatant, but knowing it helps you really enjoy this film. I know I did.


If you don't know or like 'Quadrophenia', this film is likely to fall on blind eyes, so to speak.


What's Good About It


There's plenty to like in this film. It looks like they made this film out of off-cuts from Quadrophenia in parts and then it segues into its own thing just beautifully. The cinematography, the production design, the editing, are all lovingly rendered. The performances are great and there's really never a dull moment as you watch Pinkie the psychopath cause havoc.


Also, the moment pictured above, where Pinkie on his stolen scooter with Phil Davis' Spicer in tow, finds itself leading the mod's scooters is priceless. Phil Davis of course was in 'Quadrophenia' playing Chalky. There is also a shot of the hotel steps which is the same angle as the one in 'Quadrophenia'. It was so close, I expected Sting - or somebody who looked like Sting - to come bounding out dressed as a Bell Boy. It didn't happen, but my heart quickened in anticipation. It's that kind of film. If you know and love Quadrophenia, then 'Brighton Rock' is a must-see film.


What's Bad About It


I think that for a film that works so hard to work in the riots and the Quadrophenia look, it might have y'know, slotted a Who song in there somewhere.


What's Interesting About it


Alas, I should have done a movie double with 'Quadrophenia'. Oh well... For instance, the landscape relationship apparently doesn't make sense, but only if you don't know 'Quadrophenia'. The reviewer above complains most bitterly that Dover makes an appearance for no good reason. Well, in 'Quadrophenia', Jimmy the personality-afflicted mod rides the lambretta he stole from Sting's character, right up to Beachy Head where he destroys the scooter in a gesture of identity suicide. So in this film, the psychopathic Pinkie takes his young wife Rose up to Beachy Head on a stolen lambretta to urge her to suicide. While I've never been to Brighton, I know the Brighton Beach in that movie fairly well. Once the riot breaks out, I kept expecting to catch glimpses of action that matched 'Quadrophenia'. The shot where some youths break a shop window shot from inside, clearly is in reference to the earlier picture.


There's Crazy And Then there's Psychopathy


What really pops out about both films is the apparent hands-off attitude to insanity. In 'Quadrophenia', it is quite possible Jimmy has gone schizophrenic because of his drugs, but it's never made explicit as an explanation. In 'Brighton Rock', it's never quite explained how or why Pinkie comes into the world, but it is clear that from the beginning, there is something deeply wrong with this character. Indeed, Pinkie is at once a total misfit from the get-go. He's a young hoodlum, raised by a hoodlum, who witnesses the death of his father figure, as well as getting facially disfigured.


Psychological problems always make for good drama, and in a sense this is why drama queens we meet in real life might be people harbouring a personality disorder or an outright insanity of some kind. One other thing that can be said for certain is that having crazy characters means he writer does not have to delineate a motivation that we find logical. In other words, you don't know what they're going to do next because if there's only crazy logic to it, then it means it's not going to be rational.


Still, the film works very carefully as to why Pinkie does certain things. The father figure in the photo is dressed in a war time parka, so he puts it on on the important day. He steals a lambretta scooter, which combined with the war time parka makes him look the part of the mod. Clearly it's a gag. It's totally crazy-reasoning for the character that somehow lands Pinkie at the head of the mod crowd, who are in  one sense the expression of the dysfunction in British society; but the film works very hard to get him there. Now, the deeper question to ask is whether the craziness of the rioting youths and the hoodlum violence of Pinkie and his gangster life are interchangeably equivalent in English culture.


Is Pinkie violent because he's just born that way? Or is it a social problem of England that manifests itself as both the senseless youth riots and the psychopathic killer that is Pinkie? And that question might be the reason why the film makers decided to update Brighton Rock to the era of the riots. The cathrsis of death at Beachy Head in 'Brighton Rock' is not only evoking 'Quadrophenia', it is symbalically raising the issue of why there are such people. Is society headed over the cliff with Pinkie?


In light of the recent riots in the UK, it does make you wonder if there's a lot more crazy out there than we thought.


Teenage Wasteland, It's Only Teenage Wasteland


Pete Townshend made a million out of singing about how awkward being an adolescent can be. Indeed, the phrase "teeange wasteland" sums up so much of the angst and inadequacy of feeling these characters growing up and coming of age in the 1960s.  There's a little alleyway in Brighton that has turned into a shrine because of the sex scene that was shot for 'Quadrophenia'. It's all part of the emotional terrain that is worked hard in 'Brighton Rock', for both Pinkie and Rose are awkward adolescents who have only ventured into adulthood with the minimum of emotional equipment. The kiss in the rain is particularly awkward and strange, and it harks back to the awkward sex in the alley from the earlier film.


One of the unstated issues in the film is the inadequacy of both Pinkie and Rose in their inability to express their inner turmoil. Rose thinks she has made a connection with Pinkie, simply because he tells her they have a connection. She nary searches her own feelings before she's decided that she is going with him to the ends of the world. Pinkie doesn't even know how he feels because he's too traumatised and he's a psychopath. His stated reasons for doing things are ironically at odds with what he really seems to want. This dynamic of two inadequate people groping for a relationship finds a connection with the abortive sexual encounter in the alleyway in 'Quadrophenia'. Phil Daniels' Jimmy thinks he's the problem while he worships Steph, and it turns out Steph can only be described as a feckless girl with personality problems of her own. Rose and Jimmy are both yearning for the other person without knowing who the other person is, and in both films they finish up not knowing.


Is Pinkie Evil?


The world that is presented in 'Brighton Rock' is tangibly limited and the horizon for its characters are nowhere near as wide as the ocean. They swim in a small pond of a community, and are largely incapable of change. The gritty social realism in the film is enough to make you recoil in horror, just looking at the council building flat or the ugly backstreets. The England of 1964 is nowhere near as glamorous as the swinging 60s ought to feel. It is in this cosseted world that Pinkie has grown into being, perhaps like a tumour.


On the face of it, there's no arguing the fact that Pinkie is evil. But it's also pretty clear that Pinkie is a psychopath. It brings up the point whether criminality is a function of society and mental illness. Pinkie is at once a belligerently hostile young man who earns his angry young man epithet easily, but he's also incredibly recessive for his obvious moral weaknesses. Similarly, Rose is only socially normative to the degree that Catholic guilt has shaped her into a cowering woman, but we find in her alliance with Pinkie against Ida that her morality doesn't run all that deep. It falls upon deaf ears that she could be charged with being an accomplice. They're both far more crazy than they are criminal, although their criminality does cause problems for them; it's almost as if it is a side issue. They're rebels without a cause and without a clue.


It might seem like the same old depressing film making to some but this film does offer up some interesting insights into the socius of 1964 England. I guess my best advice is that you take in 'Quadrophenia' before you sit down to watch this film.

2009/08/17

Quadraphenia

Can You See The Real Marketing Ploy?

I keep buying this damn product in its many incarnations.

  • There's the double LP -Check.

  • The double CD - Check.

  • The Soundtrack version on double LP - Check

  • The Soundtrack version on double CD - Check

  • The Original Movie DVD - Check

  • The new version of the movie DVD 2 disc set - Check.

  • The concert DVD of the 1990s Who stage show of this album - Check.


And so it goes. Can't even remember the number of times I went to see it at the Valhalla cinema in the 1980s.

The entry on the original album is here. Nothing much I didn't know but this was funny:
During the 'Behind The Laughter' episode of The Simpsons, the cover of the Krustophenia record is a parody of Quadrophenia.

Anyway... Naturally, the Film has its own page.
At the time of its original release, the film was received mostly negatively by critics and was panned for its large amounts of sex, violence, profanity and drug use, which were then still fairly uncommon in film. It did acquire a large word-of-mouth reputation amongst teenagers too young to go and see it. Today it is considered a cult classic and is recognised as a realistic reflection of youth culture in the 1960s. Many have praised Phil Daniels' intense performance. The film currently holds a 100% "Fresh" rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

Sounds about right. What prompted this search of course is because I bought the 2 disc set and watched the second extras disc to find the thing was shot in 1:1.85 and not anamorphic. The production stills show Arriflex SR cameras, which doesn't negate the possibility it was shot on anamorphic, but it seems far more likely it was 1:1.85. Indeed, the director tells us so in one of the interviews. The transfer does seem to be anamorphic 16:9.

It's a bloody brilliant film, which together with 'The Kids Are Alright' and 'Tommy' prove that the creative vision of The Who extended favorably well beyond their own domain of Rock. I remember mounting a lone defense of this film at AFTRS back in the day.

A quick look at Franc Roddam's page reveals that he hasn't been spectacularly successful as a director since.
In 1977 he made his name by producing and directing a controversial, searing docu-drama called Dummy, which was watched by 14 million viewers. It told the sad, sordid story of Sandra, a deaf and mute girl who descended into prostitution and degradation on the streets of Bradford. She was portrayed by Geraldine James in a performance that won her the Prix Italia and established her reputation as a talented actress.

Roddam directed Quadrophenia in 1979, loosely based on The Who's 1973 album of the same name. It told the story of Jimmy, a teenager who was involved in the early 1960s mod phenomenon. There was a burgeoning mod revival at the time, partially inspired by the film. The film has developed a cult status, but unlike his near contemporaries Ridley Scott and Alan Parker, Roddam did not establish himself in the United States. His first Hollywood film The Bride was a commercial flop, and his work since has been sporadic. Roddam is credited with creating the series Auf Wiedersehen, Pet reflecting his roots in North East England, and devising the format for the television game show Masterchef.

As one of my colleagues told me once-upon-a-long-time-ago, it's better to be a has-been than a never-been. At least he will always have 'Quadrophenia' to his name.

2008/05/19

Movie Doubles

How Many More Times Can You Buy The Same Piece Of Music?

As it turns out, one more time than I previously thought. Look, it was a silly idea, so much so that my partner sneered "You have so many versions of the same songs," as she rolled her eyes and I forked out yet another lot of money for the DVD above. For 30bucks, you sort of go "well honey, it's $10 per disc and I'll probably never see them live..."
Life is full of bad rationalisations. :)

As the years go on, I find it deeply ironic that I was a Japanese kid who grew up in Sydney in the 1980s that happened to like a band that constantly sang about white working class English kids growing up in Post WWII England. Theoretically, I should have had very little in common with the substance of their corpus. Even the kid who introduced me to them back in Year 10 probably doesn't listen to them much now, let alone go out and buy 3 disc-set DVDs. It's life. People move on; I'm the abnormal one who seems stuck on this stuff. What can you do?

The discs are NTSC and 4:3 so really, the picture quality is some what lacking. That's about the first and last disappointment. It's 3 discs, but mostly from 2 different post-Kenny Jones era of The Who. That's right, there is such a thing as a "post-Kenny Jones era" of the Who. A number of drummers have sat in for The Who since the death of Keith Moon, and the most maligned would have been Kenny Jones. Honestly he's actually quite good when you listen to him on 'Face Daces' and 'It's Hard'; it's just that he's decidedly not Keith Moon. With the distance of time, it's quite forgivable. In fact I really like his work on songs like 'You Better You Bet' and 'Another Tricky Day. Kenny was no slouch.

The Tommy disc in the set comes from the 1989 reunion tour in which Simon Phillips (of '801 Live' fame) sat in on drums. This tour yielded the 'Join Together' double live album. The 'Quadrophenia' disc comes from a mid-90s incarnation of The Who featuring Zak Starkey on drums. Yep, that's Ringo's boy who got his first drum kit from Keith Moon - who, amazingly duplicates the entire corpus of Keith Moon's pinnacle work, live. You could say I bought this disc just to see what this incarnation of The Who was like at playing 'Quadrophenia' live, and in all honestly, it's a lot better than I thought.

The third disc consists of them banging out the classic hits 'My Generation' 'Substitute', then a rave up on Won't Get Fooled Again'. Painfully predictable, obstinately obligatory, enduring, endearing and incredibly tired. It's never as good as the version on 'The Kids Are Alright'. Even the most recent studio album featured a bonus live disc with them winding their way through this stuff. Hell is yet another bonus recording of 'Won't Get Fooled Again', but hey, I never, never, never, ever say no.

So 'Quadrophenia', What Gives?
A little bit of historical perspective here... Of all the Who studio albums with Moon on drums, the most difficult to reproduce live for The Who was Quadrophenia. They tried to tour with these songs with taped backings, much as they had done with 'Who's Next', but the tape machines kept breaking down and the frustrated band eventually abandoned the prospect of playing a 'Quadrophenia' show after only a handful of outings. By 1975, the Who stripped down their arrangements back to basics and 'Who By Numbers' is a very stark album in comparison to the preceding two majestic recordings.

Thus, playing 'Quadrophenia' live is one heck of a technical challenge, much more so than 'Tommy'. When you see this DVD, you see just why. Apart from the core 3 members, there are 12 other musicians listed in the credits. PJ Proby and Billy Idol appear as guest vocalists, Pete's younger brother Simon handles the Electric Guitar work, and 3 guys get credits as keyboard players, with a horn section and a percussionist to boot.

Quick impressions: Simon's a daggy player. His guitar playing is really disappointing; so much so I felt "I coulda done better!" - which is not what you want to feel watching it. Zak Starkey on the other hand amazes from start to finish. Every drum fill, every roll, every Moon nuance from the original album is recreated lovingly in his playing. It's actually quite mind-boggling, but there it is, he's like a reincarnation of the man himself.

The music flies along much like the album. The video vignettes explaining the story seem a little redundant if you know the album, but the show was prepared for a largely ignorant American audience so you have to just take it in and ignore the bits you know. After all this time, it seems unlikely there would be Who fans anywhere on the planet that didn't understand their Mod roots, but there you go.

Tommy Can You Sell Me More?
The Tommy disc is less rewarding, partly because these performances are familiar from the 'Join Together' album. As great as Simon Phillips is, he actually doesn't mesh well with The Who. His fills are his own and his feel actually makes the music feel more 'up and down'. Where Zak Starkey recreates the natural ebb and flow, and the swing in Moon's work, Phillips' playing sounds more clinical and uninvolved. Where you expect Moon's fills, you get expert Phillips fills instead and it's quite alienating. The horn section in the 1989 incarnation actually adds a swinging funky feel than the Memphis/R&B feel that John Entwistle had arranged.

Once again, somebody else handles the bulk of the electric guitar work. Steve Bolton is a boring guitar player. He is efficient, clinical and really uninspiring - the opposite qualities to what I find in Pete's own playing. Of all the people they could have hired, why this guy? It's that bland.
I don't know which rock they found him under but it's a good thing he didn't stay. Where Simon Townshend is 'no great shakes', Steve Bolton is 'vanilla'. Well, I don't like my Who songs in vanilla.

I remember being so grateful that any incarnation of The Who were touring back in '89-'90 but over the years, I've come to dislike the 'Join Together' album. It sounded tight and modern for its time, but it hasn't survived the years. The really great live set after 'Who's Last' (It sure wasn't) is actually the 2000 Royal Albert Hall fund-raiser concert. The Tommy disc is therefore a documentation of that era more than anything else.

This all got me to think about how much of The Who's stuff is out there yet to get?
There's 'the Vegas Job' DVD out there yet and I think there's some other DVD doing the rounds. Then there's the boxed set of remastered recordings. I still haven't got 'Who Are You' on CD - I held off on that a while back, and now it's nigh impossible to spot at JB Hi-Fi. I might have to Amazon that one in.
Life goes on. I guess I just keep buying this stuff.

Blog Archive