Recent Readings
Having a bit of time, but short of cashflow, I am going over books I have stocked up over some time without being able to get to open even the first page. These include things like Herodotus' Histories which I haven't read since I was 14, and that was in a Japanese translation. I also have the Koran sitting next to my bed, not because I am an aspiring Terrorist - I'm not in anyway shape or form - but because one must know the enemy, and again I don' think I've read English translation of that book. I read a Japanese translation when I was 16-17. I went through a phase of reading *spiritual* texts where I read books on sutras such as the 'Prajnaparamita Hridaya Sutra', and also the 'Bhagvad Gita' which I was given by a high school teacher intent on warping my fragile little mind (Yes that's you, you freakozoid Mrs. Gosbell!). I guess I was going through a kind of 'spiritual research phase' before I settled on a long period of Central State Materialism and arguments at parties about being brains in a vat.
Anyway, I'm sticking my head through 2 books at once, for reasons only known to my eternally bad reading habits. One is Aristophanes' Penguin Classics edition "'The Clouds' and Other Plays" which is a hoot, but being drama, I need to go very slow in order to figure out how it gets played. I'm also reading Susan Faludi's 'Stiffed', which is an unfortunate coincidence as she goes through describing unemployed white males of South California, and frankly, I am part of the jobless throng, so it kind of stings. :)
The Susan Faludi book is an eerie read as she travels way 'out there' in order to get her facts straight. In the process she abandons easy categories and characterisations she has inherited through feminism and tries to come at the issue of masculine identity and an increasingly consumerist society. In the process, what she identifies about the US Aerospace industry is something we should make note.
People in Susan Faludi's book testify that the US aerospace industry that grew out of the WWII experience was essentially there to absorb the people coming back from the great war, to give them a position in society, so as not to let them sink into the depths that the Great Depression left their fathers. And so the Aerospace industry became one gigantic, work for the dole scheme where vast majority of workers actually didn't have anything to do, but were given jobs nonetheless, and got paid a lot of money to do it.
The structural change that swept through American Industry in the 1980s in large part under the Reaganomic mantra was to sweep aside the vestiges of this system. While the anger felt by men that Faludi chronicles is kind of interesting, it also shows that for the entire 50s, 60s and 70s, there was a generation of people who had jobs, and pretty well-paying jobs at that, doing essentially not much. This conforms to the 80/20 rule that 80% of any system's function lies in 20% of the system. That is to say, the other 80% of the system is contributing to only 20% of the result.
The US Aerospace industry Faludi describes is an industrial monolith used by the government to pay off the generation that fought WWII, but beyond that generation, all bets have been off. The reason structural unemployment is rising in many countries is not because of the economic rationalisation alone; it's because those jobs weren't really real to start off with. They were mechanisms by which a Keynsian Govenrment could dispense money to the people. The Promise of Space, was actually a big red herring. What does this mean for us? It means programmes such as the Space Shuttle programme was a crock, because it was always intended to be a crock.
Now this is something I have long-suspected, and wise readers have postulated; and partly why issues to do with the Military industry Complex (including the Kennedy Assassinations) keep coming up for discussion on this site. Faludi's findings strikes at the raison d'etre of our blog here. For, if the Aerospace Industry is indeed an elaborate kind of work-for-the-dole scheme and nothing else, we don't really have a chance of getting off this rock. We're just waiting for the next shuttle to blow up killing seven astronauts. It's just an elaborate, morbid version of the New Years' Fireworks on Sydney Harbour.
- Art Neuro
2004/05/31
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(342)
-
▼
May
(24)
- Recent Readings Having a bit of time, but short of...
- Keeping Up With The Joneses, Keeping Ahead Of The ...
- Mystery for the Ages Aging is one of those drags ...
- Don't Try This On Your Home Planet There's always...
- She Lives in Mojave in a Winnabago So goes a line ...
- 'Not Mine' Kampf Mr. Peter Raubal is a distant re...
- Worried journalists For some time I've been saying...
- Flying High Here is an update on SpaceShipOne. It...
- This is a test of the new Photoblogging function. ...
- Roboswarm The new proposal for the asteroid probl...
- Support for space? Putting aside the policy detail...
- Coming to America The man who went up and down in...
- More from Mars Rover I'm not sure what to make of ...
- Jews in Space Wasn't it Mel Brooks who came up wi...
- Need a dumb answer? Ask a dumb person... More sur...
- Troy, the Movie Don't read on if you haven't read ...
- Private Rocket Here's an interesting article abou...
- More to do with Max A few weeks back, we had a mi...
- Hi, I'm back I've been away from writing this blog...
- People who fly past Mexicans in the night ...Are ...
- While I've been gone... Thanks to loyal reader Mr...
- War is Policy Continued by Other Means The siege ...
- On the comeback trail Much like my knee which has...
- 'Moneyball' arrives in Australia The Age has done...
-
▼
May
(24)
2 comments:
Arthur, I read a book a long time ago about a world (earth, future) that fought an imaginary war in order to keep people in their place. Even produced real casualties to maintain the illusion ;)
I'm thinking of making an rpg based on the 'Fall of the Towers'
I think it a mistake to view workers as cannon fodder. Modern day workers are smarter than previous day workers, better skilled at the task at hand and better able to adapt.. but then that's to be expected, as those in the past are dead.
There has been a proposition/analysis that we are looking at a 90/10 future where 10% of the population will own 90% of the wealth, 90% owns the remaining 10%; that it's only going to the only 10% of the population to propduce 90% of the necessary services and 90% to produce the remaining 10%.
Certain industries such as the primary Sector are already headed that way.
Given the 80/20 rule of systems, it's not that surprising. Maybe 90/10 is a more radical split, but the planet's going to have a lot of people on it; and they don't actually have the economic capcity to abosorb this growth. This is manifesting itself as a degradation of the mean living standard in what was previously 'The First World'; loss of adjusted income value; and the steady growth in structural unemployment with each economic downturn.
So, even with having more skills, the tide is against the ordinary worker. The numbers say so.
Post a Comment