Showing posts with label Australian Open. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australian Open. Show all posts

2022/01/13

Life Under Covid, Year 3

Unpacking Domicron Perrottet's Fateful Decision 

The conservative (small c here) thing to have done  with respect to the pandemic as it stood, coming out of lockdown in NSW would have been to maintain some of the controls in place. This isn't a controversial thing to say. After all, the whole point of the response to the pandemic carried out by governments has been to mitigate risks of infections spreading. All this talk of needing to "flatten the curve" back in 2020 as well as the QR codes used to track the comings and goings of citizens (and in the process the citizens giving up their privacy in exchange) as well as restricting numbers of people at indoor events and so on was to ensure the pandemic did not go out of control. It seems crazy to have to write this out, but the reason I have to say small-c conservative is because the capital-C Conservative leaders of NSW then let go of controls.

Ever since the fateful decision on15 December 2021, the pandemic has been out of control. Having no controls in place immediately led to the explosion of numbers as well as long queues at PCR testing sites. By the end of the week Rapid Antigen Testing kits were sold out everywhere. Just about every place anybody went to for food pharmaceuticals would lead to a belated alert days later that they might have been exposed to COVID-19. For 8 days the NSW government let the virus have its way with its population.

And the mind boggles as to why people claiming to be conservative in nature and practice would want to do such a thing. The only explanation is that they were not conservative at all, and were in fact libertarians. Perhaps they may even be capital-l Libertarians of the variety we might abhor - for it is hard to recall an election whereby we voted in a Libertarian government. This then, was the moment the nut job far right libertarians of NSW had finally obtained controls to the levers of government. What they did with it was tear a gaping hole in the fabric of society and then pretend this was some kind of state of natural law. 

It is deplorable and abhorrent - but it seems to be what we are living with. As such I wish to exercise my libertarian choices right back at them and no longer pay any taxes. What's the point of paying into a government that doesn't look after you in a time of crisis at all? 

How My Christmas And New Years Went Down

Thanks to Perrotet and Hazzard-the-Buzzard I was too leery to go watch the one movie I had been waiting for all year, 'Spider-Man: No Way Home'. I still haven't watched it. I hear the cinemas are still packed - which sounds like infection clusters waiting to explode. 

At close to midnight on Christmas my better half got a notification that she was in contact with somebody who was positive, only 3 days before. So on early Boxing Day we decided to go get a PCR test even though we were asymptomatic, only to find the queue to the local testing clinic a mile long. Sensibly - I must say - we decided we shouldn't wait for a PCR test when we were likely not going to test positive, which was a call I made based on common sense and the dread of sitting in a car inching towards a PCR test for 3-4 hours. Instead, we opted to go to the local pharmacy to see if they had RAT kits and of course, they were sold out. In the 1 minute I was there to ascertain they didn't have them and everybody was sold out, I would get a notification 3 days later. 

Naturally as the regulations would have it, we sat in self isolation monitoring our non-existent symptoms for 7 days, and watched a lot of TV. I think we got to the end of Season 6 of 'Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.',  a show we had been watching on and off for some months. We even got through the final 10 episodes of Vikings Season 6 and then New Years came rolling in. 

We only staggered out on the 3rd January to get some meat at the butchers - because hey supermarkets have run out. I did manage to get my Moderna booster shot that day, with was a highlight. No side effects, so that was good. On the 4th I visited my sister's place to learn about managing quails. Later that night we got pinged with a notification again for that visit to the butcher. That meant we were still monitoring symptoms until the 10th and really only got out that night. I fed some quails that night. 

It's been real, y'all.  

'Personal Responsibility' Says The Guy Who Takes None

Amid this turmoil in NSW which has now led to the turmoil of all Australia, we had the personally irresponsible Prime Minister Scomo the Lame-o declare it was all a matter of personal responsibility now. It sounds good, but it would have helped to have made taking that responsibility a feasible thing. As it is, the RAT kits are nowhere to be found and when you can get them, the price gouging is pretty steep. 

The way taking personal responsibility has worked out for me is to essentially go back into lockdown on my own account to the extent that is permissible and sustainable. I feel sorry for people who cannot avoid going out to work, and I'm completely basking the luxury of being able to self isolate as much as I can. Yet, to be told by this incompetent Prime Minister that it's all on my responsibility ledger now is a bit rich. 

This is the same Prime Minister who ran off to Hawaii during the 2019 bushfire crisis. 

I don't see these coalition governments - Federal and NSW - surviving the next election, but I felt the same way in 2019, so I don't know what to think any more. Clearly I live in a country with an idiot electorate. We've got to vote out these jokers. 

Speaking of Jokers

This business of Novak Djokovic and his no-vax ways is to put it mildly, a sick joke. 

First, he's a champion that not many people have warmed to because he's a Serbian asshole. To make things worse, while he's a great player but he is also an anti-vaxer. The second part sort of rules him out of visiting Australia during the pandemic - because that's the law. Then, he gets some kind of exemption because he's a tennis champ and really, the Australian Open really needs its drawcards right now. But Scomo and Border Force are natural born cunts so he gets pinged like some refugee (hilarious). He goes and stays in the quarantine facility with real refugees while his case is heard in court. The judge is a tennis fan and says he can stay, and that Border Force were out of line. And yet somehow the Minister in charge of border bullies Alex Hawke has the option to send him packing. Will he or won't he? Stay tuned. *gag*

The twists and turns are like a bad soap opera. Nobody except Serbian Anti-vaxers seem to like this guy - but people still want him to hit the ball at the Australian Open. It's a mystery who we're supposed to root for in this miserable story. That, in a nutshell is life during the pandemic in Australia, year 3.   







2009/02/02

Nadal-Federer

5 Set Epic

Grand Slam tennis finals should be like this more often. Surprisingly they rarely meet the hype and expectations. This match had the No.1 and No.2 in the world squaring off against one another; one was trying to win in Australia for the first time, the other was going for a record of Grand Slam wins; The No.2 was the recently dethroned No.1, the No.1 was the recently crowned former No.2. It was all drama, and lived up to the hype.

Federer came into the match looking to extend his Grand Slam tally and equal Pete Sampras. He showed all his style and form in arriving to the finals, looking like he was peaking at the right time. Nadal on the other hand had just played a punishing 5 set Semi-final that went for 5 hours, only 48 hours before.

They traded  blow for blow, game for game, break for break and crashed into the fifth set. In the end, Federer faltered just that little bit, allowing Nadal to get the early break, and Federer never found his way back into the match. After a match that lasted 4hours and 20 minutes, the last man standing was Nadal. It wasn't easy work.

Federer's Game

After years of dominance, it is easy to see where Roger Federer has lot his zip. He's less precise off the backhand side, and he has less speed. It's not by much and he still has enough court coverage to beat almost anybody else but Nadal. Nadal's footspeed was such that it neutralised Federer's great shot-making ability while giving himself plenty of opportunities to pick off winners.

Ferderer's serve has also lost something off his peak peiod. The command of both corners in the  deuce court is less dominant, and the one looking to go wide in the deuce court didn't look quite as his salad days. Worse still, the kinds of points Federer could construct with his game found counterpoints from Nadal.

It seemed harder and harder to see how Federer could break Nadal. Nadal's lefty game essentially turns Federer's game inside out to a point that one of Federer's big weapons, the forehand cross court, plays into Nadal's great strength, the double-handed back hand. The other strength, the off-forehand, requires Federer to find a way to get Nadal to open the deuce court, but all too often Nadal simply beat the ball.

At the net, Federer just wasn't himself. He looked uncertain in a lot of his volleys.

Nadal's Game

If one thing has changed in Nadal's technique, it is his groundstrokes. Gone are the big loopy back swings. His take-back on both sides are far more compact than they used to be. Combined with the astounding foot-speed, Nadal seemed to be able to make all sorts of unlikely shots work.

The double-handed backhand cross court won Nadal a lot of points off the baseline, and even though Federer was trying to work it in a way as to deny Nadal the angle, he would stil find the angles. It was almost as if Federer was playing somebody with a double-handed forehand on the right side, and a forehand on the left.

Nadal may have found an entirely new plateau of 'greatness'. There has never been anything like this kind of game. The last dominant left hander was  probably Goran Ivanisevic, and before that you have to go back to John McEnroe and before that Rod Laver himself. None of those guys had quite the all-round power game displayed by Nadal.

It's that seldom that a left hander comes along and dominates the game. It is possible that because of that very rareness, it is hard to find many players who have a game plan against one.

The Mettle of being No.1

When Federer first came along, I thought he had a great all-round game with fantastic technique and no head at all. Then he got his head together and dominated like crazy. But all the while I've felt that if there was one suspect part of his game, it was actually his head space. He's always been a little brittle, but nobody managed to stick it to him during his dominant years.

Nadal on the other hand must be one of the toughest mongrels I've seen on court. The guy just does not concede or 'give'. He doesn't stop, he doesn't let up, he just keeps hammering away at his shots. Jim Courier who used to be quite a gutsy bulldog himself, marveled at the stamina and mental fortitude of Nadal.

Federer And No.14


Pete Sampras probably had a good chuckle last night.

The Australian Open's surface plays slower than the US hard court. It seems to be fast enough to trouble clay court specialists, but bounces high enough to trouble grass court players.Of the four grand slam tourneys, it's probably the second hardest surface for Federer's style of play. In a way, if you thought about how much Nadal had to stretch his game to play well here and how much Federer has to stretch his game to play well here, it seems that the Australian Open i actually a harder place for Federer

It's going to be very hard for Federer to win No.14. He's got 2 shots this year: Wimbledon and the US this year, because I don't see him beating Nadal on clay in Roland Garros.

The Single-Handed Backhand

The single-handed backhand has gone the way of the dodo in women's tennis. It's a rare player who hits it with authority these days. Justine Henin would be a recent example. Martina Hingis had a reasonably crafty one, but she didn't have a power game that fed off it. Amelie Mauresmo had a good singlehander from memory. Then it's all the way back to Steffi Graf, then Martina Navratilova. It's not a big list.

At one point it seemed they just stamped out these tennis prodigies with doubles-fisters from the same mold. They probably did at Nick Bollotieri's tennis camp.

The list of dominant double-fisters starts at Chris Evert and goes:

  • Chirs Evert

  • Tracy Austin

  • Andrea Yeager

  • Mary Pierce

  • Monica Seles

  • Arantxa Sanchez

  • Lindsay Davenport

  • Jennifer Capriati

  • Venus Wiliams

  • Serena Williams

  • Maria Sharapova


The men's tour has been quite different. The single-handed backhand seems to have been a vital part of many a champion. dating back to when they started to rank players, theres;

  • John Newcombe (crap backhand but single handed;  8weeks)

  • Ilie Nastase

  • John McEnroe (lefty)

  • Ivan Lendl

  • Stefan Edberg

  • Boris Becker

  • Tomas Muster (6weeks!)

  • Pete Sampras

  • Gustavo Kuerten

  • Juan Carlos Ferrero

  • Roger Federer

  • Pat Rafter (1 week!)


Even if you discount the short tenures of the Aussies and Muster, Most of these guys were dominant for quite long time in ther respective epochs. The double-hander lists goes:

  • Jimmy Connors (the original!)

  • Bjorn Borg

  • Mats Wilander

  • Jim Courier

  • Andre Agassi

  • Mara Safin

  • Leyton Hewitt

  • Andy Roddick (a shortlived stint at the no.1 spot, but a pretty good player)

  • Rafael Nadal (lefty)


If you count out the 2 seventies guys at the top, it's a much, much shorter list. I always put this down to range. The guys who have good single-handed backhands can cover the court more and have more options for their shots.

Watching Nadal last night, I thought it might be the end of the single-handed backhand. It's unlikely, given the trends, but he was so good it shook my faith. :)

Blog Archive