Art wrote something in the comments section, and I'm replying to it here because I think the discussion is what the blog is about.
Art wrote:
"It may well be exactly as you say. But there's no real quid pro quo here, so I don't know if the Spanish public are going to get what they want.
Hypothetical:
So they elect a Socialist Govt who pulls the troops out of Iraq. What guarantees have the Spanish got that Al-Qaeda and its allies won't do more stuff in Spain?
If indeed the Spanish got a quid pro quo deal, then that would make it true that the Spanish are breaking ranks with the 'Coalition of the Willing' so that would be more like, 'treachery', not 'appeasement '.
If in fact the Spaniards don't care, and they just want out, then Al-Qaeda have beaten the Spanish hands down. That would be 'capitulation'.
Just thinking out loud here"
Art, you are assuming that the invasion of Iraq somehow threatened Al Qaeda, and that withdrawing from Iraq somehow helps them. The whole point I was making was that your assumption cannot be justified and has never been tested.
Bin Laden's stated objective is to ignite a war between all of Islam, and everything he identifies as un-Islamic (ie, Western society). Did the invasion of Iraq advance or hinder that agenda?
While Saddam was in power, Al Qaeda was unable to operate in Iraq. Now they set off bombs there every 2 weeks. Do you think they want to go back to the old days?
Immediately before the invasion the entire US special operations command moved from Afghanistan to the middle east. What effect did this have on the operations against Al Qaeda?
I am only aware of three ways of reducing the threat of terrorism:
1. Destroying their bases and training camps.
2. Reducing the support they receive, by putting pressure on the individuals and regimes that support them.
3. Arresting/killing operatives in the field.
The invasion of Iraq did nothing to reduce the threat of terrorism, and in fact increased it. What effect is withdrawing from Iraq going to have?
- James Lownie
2004/03/19
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2004
(342)
-
▼
March
(33)
- Is this another clever record company trick to rip...
- Missed this one... NASA are thinking about an outr...
- Yellow Shark In a Frank Zappa reference kind of w...
- Sins of the Great-great-great Grandfathers? There...
- Wang Yang-Ming Notes Because Wang Yang-Ming came ...
- All Quiet on the Space Exploration Front There's n...
- But how do you land this thing? NASA successfully ...
- Chris Manifesto notes Can something as long term ...
- Following on Analysts are now saying that the disc...
- Jobsearch 2004 As some of you may know, I'm on the...
- Origins of Moneyball Bill James is a baseball sta...
- A veritable, rich treasure trove for all you space...
- Of Ice and Them Here is an article covering the po...
- He swings, he misses! An asteroid bogey did a fly-...
- Danish Space Policy This internet document dates ...
- Terrorism and Policy There was no transaction bet...
- Ike Eisenhower apparently had an emergency governm...
- Name Change I've changed the name of this blog to ...
- Today's Space Garni du Jour This is an article abo...
- Australian Space Policy Australia, it happens was...
- Well it seems the current smoke issues have seized...
- blog? What is that? A virtual dump?
- Unintelligent Design Recently Ohio went ahead with...
- Art wrote something in the comments section, and I...
- Art has summed up my main reason why going into sp...
- Always on the Run Sometimes these news items seem ...
- It seems that a large section of the western mass ...
- Tax Policy This is interesting: a new tax policy b...
- Space Policy What got us talking initially was spa...
- Well, having been quoted by Art as believing we ha...
- Andrew Denton gets noticed in the USA... ...for i...
- First Up! James Lownie was quick to respond to th...
- Welcome dear friends to the blog with no purpose. ...
-
▼
March
(33)
No comments:
Post a Comment